<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[GM CEO Pledges to Work with UAW; Concerns About IPO Arise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/concerns-about-gm-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/concerns-about-gm-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/concerns-about-gm-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/gm-1281049102.jpg" alt="General Motors" />In a <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/driveon/post/2010/09/gm-ceo-says-hell-work-with-the-union/1">Labor Day message</a> to <a href="http://autos.aol.com/gm-general-motors" class="inlinked">General Motors</a> employees, his first companywide statement since becoming CEO, Dan Akerson pledged to cooperate with the United Auto Workers (UAW). "Coming from a union family, I know on a very personal level the good things that unions can do," said Akerson, GM's fourth chief executive since 2009.</p>
<p>The UAW will negotiate a new contract with GM next year, and it may attempt to restore losses it agreed to ahead of <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/gm-bankruptcy-questions" class="inlinked">GM's bankruptcy</a>. This is expected to be a challenge for Akerson, who has a reputation for telling subordinates to "stop complaining and start working."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/concerns-about-gm-ipo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM CEO Pledges to Work with UAW; Concerns About IPO Arise</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/concerns-about-gm-ipo/">GM CEO Pledges to Work with UAW; Concerns About IPO Arise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/concerns-about-gm-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19621691/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/concerns-about-gm-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dan Akerson</category><category>General Motors</category><category>General Motors IPO</category><category>GM</category><category>GM IPO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UAW adds its voice to new General Motors board of directors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/uaw-adds-its-voice-to-new-general-motors-board-of-directors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/uaw-adds-its-voice-to-new-general-motors-board-of-directors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/uaw-adds-its-voice-to-new-general-motors-board-of-directors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/uaw_160.gif" />The United Auto Workers union will own a 17.5% stake in the new General Motors company through its Voluntary Employee Benefits Trust (VEBR).<br />As part of that ownership stake, the UAW's interests will be represented on the board of directors by former Wall Street Analyst Stephen Girsky.<br /><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/autos/autobeat/archives/2009/06/uaw_sends_girsk.html"><br />BusinessWeek reports</a> that "While Girsky has served as an advisor to the union for several years, and clearly has a soft spot for labor, he's all too aware of GM's problems. He was a tough critic of the company when he covered its stock for Morgan Stanley. Girsky also worked at the company as an advisor to former CEO Rick Wagoner, too. Don't look for him to press CEO Fritz Henderson to give the UAW a contract that would erase some of the concessions that were made prior to bankruptcy."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/uaw-adds-its-voice-to-new-general-motors-board-of-directors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UAW adds its voice to new General Motors board of directors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/uaw-adds-its-voice-to-new-general-motors-board-of-directors/">UAW adds its voice to new General Motors board of directors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/uaw-adds-its-voice-to-new-general-motors-board-of-directors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19072562/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/uaw-adds-its-voice-to-new-general-motors-board-of-directors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Stephen Girsky</category><category>StephenGirsky</category><category>UAW</category><category>VEBR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM shares reopen after being halted; bondholders agree to sweetened proposal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/flash-gm-shares-halted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/flash-gm-shares-halted/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/flash-gm-shares-halted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" /><strong>Last Updated at 10:20</strong></p>
<p>According to CNBC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) shares were halted as bondholders agreed to a sweetened deal. Shares have been reopened since. (This post is a live update). GM shares have jumped over 15% since trading has resumed.</p>
<p>This still doesn't mean a bankruptcy has been avoided, but at least creditors would not oppose attempts to sell GM's profitable assets to a new company -- the "New GM" -- sponsored by the U.S. Treasury.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/flash-gm-shares-halted/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM shares reopen after being halted; bondholders agree to sweetened proposal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/flash-gm-shares-halted/">GM shares reopen after being halted; bondholders agree to sweetened proposal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/flash-gm-shares-halted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19050283/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/flash-gm-shares-halted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>General Motors</category><category>gm</category><category>GM bankruptcy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UAW</category><category>VEBA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM inches even closer to bankruptcy as bondholders reject offer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/gm-inches-even-closer-to-bankruptcy-as-bondholders-reject-offer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/gm-inches-even-closer-to-bankruptcy-as-bondholders-reject-offer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/gm-inches-even-closer-to-bankruptcy-as-bondholders-reject-offer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) announced this morning that not enough of its bondholders agreed to <a href="http://news.aol.com/article/gm-says-bondholder-offer-fails/499575">swap its debt for company stock</a>, pushing the automaker even closer to bankruptcy. GM was offering to exchange $27 billion in unsecured debt for 10% of the company's stock. The struggling Detroit damsel has until Monday to finish its restructuring or it will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. This deadline was set by the government and includes requirements regarding debt reduction, labor cost cuts and plant closures.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/gm-inches-even-closer-to-bankruptcy-as-bondholders-reject-offer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM inches even closer to bankruptcy as bondholders reject offer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/gm-inches-even-closer-to-bankruptcy-as-bondholders-reject-offer/">GM inches even closer to bankruptcy as bondholders reject offer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 May 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/gm-inches-even-closer-to-bankruptcy-as-bondholders-reject-offer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19048960/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/gm-inches-even-closer-to-bankruptcy-as-bondholders-reject-offer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automakers</category><category>bailout</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>gm</category><category>government bailout</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM and United Auto Workers to clinch deal on health care]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-24-200cm101608.jpg" alt="" />In a clock-stopping move,<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/05e0c0a8-4635-11de-803f-00144feabdc0.html"> the United Auto Workers and GM have come to an agreement</a> on a health care deal. The key provision of the deal is that GM would contribute shares instead of cash to a health-care trust known as a Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association (Veba). </p>
<p>In so doing, the UAW would own 39% of GM. The mix of ownership would then be 50% to the government, 39% to the UAW and 10% to the bondholders, with the remaining 1% for current shareholders. The agreement still must be ratified by GM workers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM and United Auto Workers to clinch deal on health care</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/">GM and United Auto Workers to clinch deal on health care</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/05e0c0a8-4635-11de-803f-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1553898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>restructuring</category><category>uaw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UAW says it will dump stake in Chrysler. Can taxpayers dump theirs too?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/05/uaw-says-it-will-dump-stake-in-chrysler-can-taxpayers-dump-thei/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/05/uaw-says-it-will-dump-stake-in-chrysler-can-taxpayers-dump-thei/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/05/uaw-says-it-will-dump-stake-in-chrysler-can-taxpayers-dump-thei/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/chrysler-logo.jpg" alt="" />The UAW healthcare trust is set to receive a 55% stake in Chrysler under the sale plan filed with the United States bankruptcy court, but those of us hoping that would give the union a long-term stake in the health of company -- as opposed to using it as a honey pot from which to extract as much blood as possible at the cost of the company's health -- will be sorely disappointed. UAW president Ron Gettelfinger <a href="http://news.aol.com/article/uaw-chief-says-union-will-sell-its/454763">says that the union</a> will dump its entire stake in the company immediately.<br /><br />Right: The United States taxpayer is supposed to pump billions of dollars into the auto industry in exchange for an 8% stake in Chrysler, and we're assured that it's a prudent long-term investment and we won't get screwed. But when it's the UAW's turn, it refuses to take any long-term equity stake in the company it's insisted we pour billions into.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/05/uaw-says-it-will-dump-stake-in-chrysler-can-taxpayers-dump-thei/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UAW says it will dump stake in Chrysler. Can taxpayers dump theirs too?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/05/uaw-says-it-will-dump-stake-in-chrysler-can-taxpayers-dump-thei/">UAW says it will dump stake in Chrysler. Can taxpayers dump theirs too?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 May 2009 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.aol.com/article/uaw-chief-says-union-will-sell-its/454763>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/05/uaw-says-it-will-dump-stake-in-chrysler-can-taxpayers-dump-thei/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1536738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/05/uaw-says-it-will-dump-stake-in-chrysler-can-taxpayers-dump-thei/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM deal with government will hurt Ford ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/gm-deal-with-government-will-hurt-ford/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/gm-deal-with-government-will-hurt-ford/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/gm-deal-with-government-will-hurt-ford/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/car-cropped.jpg" alt="" />The pressure that the Administration is putting on the UAW and the creditors at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler may be good for the two troubled car companies, but the help for the two weak companies could hurt the strongest one -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>). </p>
<p>Any cost advantages that come out of deals forced on labor because of the threat of Chapter 11 will cut costs at GM, and might bring those costs well below what Ford has been able to get in concessions on its own. GM could end up with a substantial gross margin lead over the No. 2 U.S. car maker.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/gm-deal-with-government-will-hurt-ford/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM deal with government will hurt Ford </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/gm-deal-with-government-will-hurt-ford/">GM deal with government will hurt Ford </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/gm-deal-with-government-will-hurt-ford/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504549/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/gm-deal-with-government-will-hurt-ford/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unions leap to Wagoner's defense: Why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/unions-leap-to-wagoners-defense-why/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/unions-leap-to-wagoners-defense-why/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/unions-leap-to-wagoners-defense-why/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p>Normally, unions blame management for corporate problems and management blames unions. The truth? Both are usually right.<br /><br />But the Associated Press <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/29968578">reports</a> that exiled <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) CEO Richard Wagoner is being defended as a "sacrificial lamb," "scapegoat" and "fall guy" by workers and union bosses.<br />
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span id="byLine"></span>"We knew someone was going to have to take the proverbial `bullet,' and it would have made it a lot easier to accept that had the CEOs of the banks also been required to give up their jobs," said Jim Graham, president of a union local in Lordstown, Ohio, where GM produces the Cobalt and Pontiac G5 fuel-efficient cars. <br /></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The comparison isn't entirely unreasonable: Ken Lewis and Vikram Pandit should have been dumped out on the street too, and it's a testimony to both appallingly bad corporate governance and poor oversight by the federal government that either of them currently has a job doing anything other than dogwalking.<br /></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">But why defend Wagoner? By defending Wagoner's "leadership", people like Mr. Graham are essentially admitting that GM was essentially destined to fail because of overseas competition and its uncompetitive labor costs. If they want to deflect blame from themselves, they should be embracing the Richard Wagoner as The Man Who Ruined General Motors script. Otherwise, there's nowhere to point the finger but inward.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/unions-leap-to-wagoners-defense-why/">Unions leap to Wagoner's defense: Why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/unions-leap-to-wagoners-defense-why/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1503950/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/unions-leap-to-wagoners-defense-why/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Richard Wagoner</category><category>RichardWagoner</category><category>UAW</category><category>Unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why don't we just hand the UAW the keys to GM and Chrysler?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/why-dont-we-just-hand-the-uaw-the-keys-to-gm-and-chrysler/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/why-dont-we-just-hand-the-uaw-the-keys-to-gm-and-chrysler/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/why-dont-we-just-hand-the-uaw-the-keys-to-gm-and-chrysler/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p>B<img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/gm-hq-1.jpg" />ack in June, the National Center for Employee Ownership published a list of the top-100 employee-owned companies in the United States. To be considered for the rankings, companies had to have at least 50% of their stock owned by "an ESOP, a stock purchase plan in which most full-time employees can participate, a profit sharing plan or other trust, or some combination of such plans."<br /><br />You might be surprised by the number of household names that made the list: Publix Supermarkets, Price Chopper, Hy-Vee, Lifetouch and Amsted Industries, just to name a few.<br /><br /> I wonder: Could that business model work for the beleaguered Detroit auto industry? <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler are being crushed under the weight of enormous obligations to current workers and retirees, along with long-term debt and government loans. Both companies still need more government money, and one option that's being considered is a bankruptcy filing.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/why-dont-we-just-hand-the-uaw-the-keys-to-gm-and-chrysler/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why don't we just hand the UAW the keys to GM and Chrysler?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/why-dont-we-just-hand-the-uaw-the-keys-to-gm-and-chrysler/">Why don't we just hand the UAW the keys to GM and Chrysler?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/why-dont-we-just-hand-the-uaw-the-keys-to-gm-and-chrysler/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1468711/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/why-dont-we-just-hand-the-uaw-the-keys-to-gm-and-chrysler/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>UAW</category><category>United Auto Workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The UAW will get a call from the president]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/the-uaw-will-get-a-call-from-the-president/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/the-uaw-will-get-a-call-from-the-president/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/the-uaw-will-get-a-call-from-the-president/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/uaw_160.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Congress would like to keep the car companies viable and independent and is spending a lot of time and money toward those goals. As <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler reach the point where they need to have plans to show they can manage their businesses with government loans, the UAW is starting to give them a hard time. Someone is going to have to break the log jam.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=acmrNOSikzPs&amp;refer=home">According to Bloomberg</a>, "The United Auto Workers union is objecting to proposals from General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC to modify a retiree health-care fund as required by the U.S."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/the-uaw-will-get-a-call-from-the-president/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The UAW will get a call from the president</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/the-uaw-will-get-a-call-from-the-president/">The UAW will get a call from the president</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/the-uaw-will-get-a-call-from-the-president/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1460340/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/the-uaw-will-get-a-call-from-the-president/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>Congress</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UAW and creditors may work against GM]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/uaw-and-creditors-may-work-against-gm-gm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/uaw-and-creditors-may-work-against-gm-gm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/uaw-and-creditors-may-work-against-gm-gm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" />The UAW is not moving at much of a clip in terms of negotiating with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>). There has not been a single sign of progress, no news of concessions on wages or benefits. Congress was hoping labor costs would be brought down to the level of what Japanese companies pay US workers.</p>
<p>Creditors also appear to be getting ready to give the US's largest car company a hard time. A successful bailout of GM assumes that bond holders will swap much of what they owe for equity or simply reduce the amount that they are owed or the interest rates on those sums.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123206525584388061.html?mod=testMod">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "General Motors Corp. bondholders formed a committee to negotiate terms of a debt-for-equity swap, a key requirement of the auto maker's loan from the U.S. government." </p>
<p>The firms holding GM's bonds may simply tell the company that unless they get a good deal for turning in their bonds that there is not deal at all. Creditors may believe it is worth the risk that GM may go into Chapter 11.</p>
<p>The UAW and creditors are probably playing the same game of chicken with GM and the new administration. Can the government allow GM to fail when the stimulus package is set up to increase US employment by three million jobs or more? A bankruptcy could build a big hole if its causes Detroit and its suppliers to lay off over one million employees.</p>
<p>The creation of a creditors committee is bad news for GM.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/uaw-and-creditors-may-work-against-gm-gm/">UAW and creditors may work against GM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/uaw-and-creditors-may-work-against-gm-gm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1431445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/uaw-and-creditors-may-work-against-gm-gm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[That didn't take long: GM CEO says he might need more money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/that-didnt-take-long-gm-ceo-says-he-might-need-more-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/that-didnt-take-long-gm-ceo-says-he-might-need-more-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/that-didnt-take-long-gm-ceo-says-he-might-need-more-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img height="171" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/gm_general_motors_logo-726848.jpg" width="171" align="right" vspace="4" />The ink is barely dry on the $13.4 billion in "loans" provided by the Bush administration at the end of 2008, but <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) is already talking about needing more. CEO Richard Wagoner says the company may look to <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKN1127939620090111">secure additional government cheese</a> in March -- earlier reports had suggested that GM believed the $13.4 billion would be enough to survive through 2009.</p>
<p>How does GM plan to demonstrate viability? It will need to secure broader concessions from the United Auto Workers union and, hilariously, try to convince bond holders to swap their debt for equity in one of the greater cash-burning machines in history. Good luck with that one!</p>
<p>Wagoner also said that GM is still looking to find a buyer for Saab. The company has <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200901082146DOWJONESDJONLINE001022_FORTUNE5.htm">denied problems</a> in generating interest in the brand among potential buyers -- I'll believe someone is interested in buying Saab when there's a done deal. Similarly, GM has failed to generate any serious interest in Hummer, despite <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/general-motors-tries-really-really-hard-to-find-a-buyer-for-hum/">trying really, really hard</a> to find a buyer.</p>
<p>GM's management has been extremely optimistic in terms of its "forward-looking statements," but so far it's all been bluster. Government officials should keep that in mind when GM brass shows up in March to demonstrate a plan for viability.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/that-didnt-take-long-gm-ceo-says-he-might-need-more-money/">That didn't take long: GM CEO says he might need more money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/that-didnt-take-long-gm-ceo-says-he-might-need-more-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1426221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/that-didnt-take-long-gm-ceo-says-he-might-need-more-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Auto industry</category><category>Bailout</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>Hummer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Richard Wagoner</category><category>Saab</category><category>UAW</category><category>United Auto Workers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM: We don't need any more money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/gm-we-dont-need-any-more-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/gm-we-dont-need-any-more-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/gm-we-dont-need-any-more-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-gm-200cs080708.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) is now walking around Washington making the case that the money the government may offer it will be all it needs, ever. That is highly unlikely, so the reason behind the assertion is a puzzle.
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adjAfaUdbWbU&amp;refer=home">According to</a> <em>Bloomberg, "</em>General Motors Corp. has enough government loans to cover the worst-case scenario it described last month and says it won't need more if the economy holds up." Under the current proposal GM would get $13 billion and GMAC has already gotten $6 billion.</p>
<p>The "if" part is the issue. GM's assumptions are way too optimistic.</p>
<p>Beginning on the cost side, if GM's employees, particularly UAW members, see a pot of money going into the car company, they are unlikely to take deep jobs cuts. The union has already said it has given enough. Creditors are almost certain to look at the infusion from the government as a reason to fight hard to keep their status and get full payment.</p>
<p>Looking at sales, GM still assumes a domestic vehicle market that will drive 12 million units sales a year. Based on December sales numbers, the run-rate for the entire US next year is closer to 10 million. GM may have to offer big incentives to keep its market share, which will push down margins even further.</p>
<p>Dream on.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/gm-we-dont-need-any-more-money/">GM: We don't need any more money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/gm-we-dont-need-any-more-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/gm-we-dont-need-any-more-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automakers</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As unions look to Obama, their hopes may be false]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/29/as-unions-look-to-obama-their-hopes-may-be-false/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/29/as-unions-look-to-obama-their-hopes-may-be-false/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/29/as-unions-look-to-obama-their-hopes-may-be-false/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>A Democrat as the new President. Usually the party favors unions. They give a lot of money. Democrats can also count on unions to endorse them and turn out the vote. Now it is time for the party which will control The White House and Congress to pay labor back.</p>
<p>It may not be that simple. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/29/business/economy/29labor.html?ref=business">According to</a> <em>The New York Times, "</em>labor invested more than $300 million to help elect Mr. Obama and enlarge the Democratic majority in Congress, and it expects both to enact legislation that will make it easier for millions of workers to unionize."</p>
<p>The most obvious case that unions may not do as well as they had hoped is the UAW. Many car workers believe Obama may ride to their rescue. The Bush Administration said the UAW would have to go along with large cuts as their part of helping <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler. But, potential loans form the Obama Administration to the car companies may not push the union so hard.</p>
<p>The car companies are probably a bad example and the newspaper industry is probably a better one. It was once one of the largest employers in the US and is still a huge provider of jobs. No so long ago the unions representing reporters, drivers, and pressmen had the leverage with management to dictate terms which put their members solidly into the middle class. As the newspaper industry has moved into a downward cycle, these unions have lost their bite.</p>
<p>The Obama Administration could do something for the newspaper unions. It could help bail the industry out by giving papers loans. It could help guarantee jobs. But, that won't happen. The newspaper unions will die no matter what they did to get the Democrats in office. Obama knows there is only so much money to go around. If there is not enough to help unionized industries, that's tough luck.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/29/as-unions-look-to-obama-their-hopes-may-be-false/">As unions look to Obama, their hopes may be false</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/29/business/economy/29labor.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/29/as-unions-look-to-obama-their-hopes-may-be-false/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1413276/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/29/as-unions-look-to-obama-their-hopes-may-be-false/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bush</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM SUV dinosaurs are a thing of the past]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/gm-suv-dinosaurs-are-a-thing-of-the-past/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/gm-suv-dinosaurs-are-a-thing-of-the-past/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/gm-suv-dinosaurs-are-a-thing-of-the-past/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The New York Times has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/24/business/24auto.html?_r=1&amp;hp">reported</a>: <em>The last Chevrolet Tahoe rolled off the line here in Janesville shortly after 7 a.m. in the 90-year-old plant, which had built more than 3.7 million big S.U.V.'s since the early 1990s. While the overall new vehicle market has dropped 16 percent so far this year, <strong>sales of big S.U.V.'s have plummeted 40 percent</strong>. Their closings leave the Big Three with only one factory each still devoted to making traditional big S.U.V.'s - </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> Motor (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>)<em> in Kentucky, </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>)<em> in Texas, and Chrysler in Detroit.</em></p>
<p>The car manufacturers have been hit hard by tight consumer credit, the high cost of fuel and an overall slowing of the economy. All three manufacturers have been pleading with Congress and the White House for financial support and with the UAW for contract concessions. After Two of the three (Congress and UAW) failed to act, President Bush stepped in to provide an aid package of $17 billion to get the auto companies through the first quarter of 2009.</p>
<p>Despite the rescue package finally coming through Wall Street has not been impressed. The stocks of GM (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) are down 35% since the announcement. Ford closed yesterday at $<span class="price">2.19, down</span> <span class="change">-0.40,</span> losing <span class="perc">-15.44%</span> in one day. GM closed at $<span class="price">3.00, down</span> <span class="change">-0.52, losing</span> <span class="perc">-14.77%.</span></p>
<p><span class="perc">Can either of these companies avoid bankruptcy if they cannot stay off the pink sheets? Is bankruptcy inevitable?</span> Are you buying these stocks with hopes of a recovery?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/gm-suv-dinosaurs-are-a-thing-of-the-past/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM SUV dinosaurs are a thing of the past</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/gm-suv-dinosaurs-are-a-thing-of-the-past/">GM SUV dinosaurs are a thing of the past</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/gm-suv-dinosaurs-are-a-thing-of-the-past/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1410861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/gm-suv-dinosaurs-are-a-thing-of-the-past/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>bailout</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>SUV</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Santa Cars gives Detroit a $17 billion Christmas present]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/santa-cars-gives-detroit-a-17-billion-christmas-present/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/santa-cars-gives-detroit-a-17-billion-christmas-present/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/santa-cars-gives-detroit-a-17-billion-christmas-present/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Well George W. Bush is donning his Santa Cars hat this morning. This morning he announced a package of $17.4 billion in short-term loans. But he's doing it in a way which allows his successor to yank them all back on March 31, 2009. If Bush were still in office then, he'd no doubt pull back the money. But since Obama will be there instead, we don't know what will happen. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack" itxtvisited="1"><span id="byLine" itxtvisited="1"></span>Here's Santa Cars' plan: He'll give automakers <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28311743/">$13.4 billion</a> in short-term financing from the TARP and an additional $4 billion could be available in February. But if the automakers are not financially viable by March 31, 2009, all the funds will be returned to the Treasury. What does financially viable mean? Santa Cars answer: "A positive net present value (NPV), which takes into account all current and future costs and can fully repay the government loan."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/santa-cars-gives-detroit-a-17-billion-christmas-present/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Santa Cars gives Detroit a $17 billion Christmas present</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/santa-cars-gives-detroit-a-17-billion-christmas-present/">Santa Cars gives Detroit a $17 billion Christmas present</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/santa-cars-gives-detroit-a-17-billion-christmas-present/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1406550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/santa-cars-gives-detroit-a-17-billion-christmas-present/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automakers</category><category>Bailout</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>GM</category><category>TARP</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush keeps Chapter 11 on the table for GM and Chrysler]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/bush-keeps-chapter-11-on-the-table-for-gm-and-chrysler/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/bush-keeps-chapter-11-on-the-table-for-gm-and-chrysler/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/bush-keeps-chapter-11-on-the-table-for-gm-and-chrysler/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/bushpic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />President Bush and his spokesman made it clear that loans to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler may carry eventual Chapter 11 filings with them. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/business/19auto.html?_r=1&amp;hp">According to</a> <em>The New York Times,</em> "The White House raised for the first time on Thursday the prospect of forcing General Motors and Chrysler into a managed bankruptcy as a solution to save the companies from financial collapse."</p>
<p>It's about time. The Administration has come around to the conclusion that many experts on restructuring have believed for months. The UAW, suppliers, and creditors cannot be forced to their knees without a bankruptcy judge standing over them. </p>
<p>The theory that a number of members of Congress wanted to adopt is that GM and Chrysler should get loans to carry them over to March 31, at which time they can present a "car czar" with restructuring packages. But what incentives do the union and creditors have to play ball? They may simply believe that the Obama White House will extend more loans to help the firms to the end of next year, which is hardly a way to induce those who need to give up economic benefits much incentive. It is human nature to hope for the best and ignore the worst. It is also a part of the UAW's history to adopt the arrogant attitude that it can run the car industry by dictating that its workers should get the best benefits in the world.</p>
<p>The only way to solve the car industry's problems is with one bold stroke. If people owed money and people owed pensions fall in the process, so be it.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/bush-keeps-chapter-11-on-the-table-for-gm-and-chrysler/">Bush keeps Chapter 11 on the table for GM and Chrysler</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/business/19auto.html?_r=1&amp;hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/bush-keeps-chapter-11-on-the-table-for-gm-and-chrysler/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1406291/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/bush-keeps-chapter-11-on-the-table-for-gm-and-chrysler/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automakers</category><category>car czar</category><category>CarCzar</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Way Off Wall Street: Can labor unions help stabilize the economy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" alt="Gary E. Sattler" />Welcome to Way Off Wall Street, a column dedicated to providing Main Street opinions on topics of interest to investors. Each installment highlights the views of Americans who are far removed from the canyons of Wall Street -- and who often see things more clearly as a result.</em><br /><br />Now that the dust has settled, it's nice to see that the factory sit-in at Republic Doors and Windows in Chicago was successfully resolved. The fact that the tumultuous event was dealt with in such a solid and peaceful manner speaks well of modern organized labor. It cannot be denied that the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America union, played a large part in bringing an acceptable resolution to the matter. This raises an important question: can and should America's labor unions find ways to be more deeply engaged in the current attempts to fix what is wrong with our nation's economy? It seems to me, in this time of great economic turmoil, that America's labor unions have stayed conspicuously on the sidelines.<br /><br />The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that in 2007 the number of Americans belonging to labor unions totaled approximately 15.7 million. I expect that for 2008 that total has declined a bit, but not much. This means labor unions watch over about 12% of our nation's hourly and salaried workers. Those aren't numbers to be taken lightly. The question is, how much of that union clout exists simply to compel corporate America to conform to it's whims, and how much of it is dedicated to particularly benefiting the overall good of the labor force without deference to what form that good might take? Labor unions exist, in essence, to protect laborers from oppression and exploitation. What is a union's part when that oppression is brought on by the larger global economy, and that exploitation is perpetrated by governments, rather than by a particular employer?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Way Off Wall Street: Can labor unions help stabilize the economy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/">Way Off Wall Street: Can labor unions help stabilize the economy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gallup.com/poll/12751/Labor-Unions.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1399089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>labor unions</category><category>LaborUnions</category><category>National Labor Relations Board</category><category>NationalLaborRelationsBoard</category><category>UAW</category><category>United Auto Workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Auto support fund: U.S. view is different]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/auto-support-fund-u-s-view-is-different/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/auto-support-fund-u-s-view-is-different/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/auto-support-fund-u-s-view-is-different/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/sbux_way_i_see_it.jpg" alt="" />This is a continuation of yesterday's story <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/" title="View Auto support fund: foreign governments help on BloggingStocks">Auto support fund: foreign governments help</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), privately held Chrysler and the UAW are in need, but help is not forthcoming with the same vigor that we have helped other industries or other nations help their industries.<br /><br />One reason is that we Americans feel very strongly that government should stay out of our lives. We not only believe in separation of church and state, but business and state. Perhaps on both counts we are pretending. Everything is all mixed up. When government allows a church to collect money and not pay taxes that sounds to me like the government is subsidizing the church. When government adjusts the tax structure for cars and insists a certain percentage be made or assembled in the United States, the same is true.<br /><br />I do not believe the "bailout" is a bailout, I believe it is loan that is being considered so that our leaders, on all sides, will have the time to create longer term solutions. I also believe the amount of money in question while very substantial, it is not so, with respect to everything else that is going on right now.<br /><br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/auto-support-fund-u-s-view-is-different/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Auto support fund: U.S. view is different</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/auto-support-fund-u-s-view-is-different/">Auto support fund: U.S. view is different</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/auto-support-fund-u-s-view-is-different/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1401174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/auto-support-fund-u-s-view-is-different/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>UAW</category><category>united auto workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Auto support fund: Foreign governments help]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/autoplant.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />The American auto industry failure is no joke. There is no consensus regarding a solution and the stakes are very high for all of us. We cannot really fathom the complete repercussions from whatever approach we take to resolve this very difficult situation involving <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), privately held Chrysler and the UAW.<br /><br />There is still no resolution to the gargantuan task of re-working the U.S. automobile industry. The White House this past weekend said that while the administration is trying to work out various scenarios to rescue the ailing industry, it has not come up with a solution yet and the people involved don't expect to make any announcements for a few days.<br /><br />I have been following the news about the auto industry like the rest of the nation and I have been writing about many of the issues that we face. Yesterday, I added a bit of irony <a title="View Sunday Funnies: Feds could buy GM &amp; Ford on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/sunday-funnies-feds-could-buy-gm-and-ford/" target="_blank">Sunday Funnies: Feds could buy GM &amp; Ford</a>, but this is no laughing matter.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Auto support fund: Foreign governments help</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/">Auto support fund: Foreign governments help</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1401131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/auto-support-fund-foreign-governments-help/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>UAW</category><category>united auto workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><category>White House</category><category>WhiteHouse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
