<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The week in preview -- Fun with economics]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/15/the-week-in-preview-fun-with-economics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/15/the-week-in-preview-fun-with-economics/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/15/the-week-in-preview-fun-with-economics/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p>Sure, there are several earnings reports coming that are going to shake, rattle, and roll, the market this week, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>), but what about those all important economic releases? Last week, the consumer price index was revealed for May and showed a monthly increase of .6% as energy was HOT once again, and the overall transportation costs rose the most since November 2007. Core inflation was up only .2% and investors liked the number as it calls for the continuation of a "Fed-Pause," which helped the dollar move up for the week.</p>
<p>New Residential Construction (permits) popped last month on an unexpected increase of the multi-family housing starts. Think about it for a minute and you will quickly realize that as families are losing their homes due to the deteriorating economic conditions, they still need live somewhere. So, the increase of 326,000 permits for multi-family housing makes perfect sense. But, don't be fooled by the fact that these are still mixed into the totals and have skewed the overall stats upwards. </p>
<p>Still, the reports have shown difficult conditions as the total starts have hit lows last seen in 1991. Before that, the lows of this level were seen in 1974. Economists over at Economy.com are looking for housing starts to drop again in May down to 985 million. Since the economy has become the real story (aside from the oil horror show), housing is vitally important, as it is really a proxy for the financial fortitude of the average family. Realize that if they are not buying homes, it is because they don't have the funds, cannot get credit and do not have confidence in their financial future. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/15/the-week-in-preview-fun-with-economics/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The week in preview -- Fun with economics</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/15/the-week-in-preview-fun-with-economics/">The week in preview -- Fun with economics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/15/the-week-in-preview-fun-with-economics/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1225247/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/15/the-week-in-preview-fun-with-economics/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>construction</category><category>DIG</category><category>Dismal.com</category><category>DUG</category><category>Economy</category><category>Economy.com</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>housing</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MS</category><category>oil inventories</category><category>Proshares</category><category>Ultra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Horowitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Nat gas dip was profit-taking, nothing more ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-nat-gas-dip-was-profit-taking-nothing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-nat-gas-dip-was-profit-taking-nothing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-nat-gas-dip-was-profit-taking-nothing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chk/" rel="tag">Chesapeake Energy (CHK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwy/" rel="tag">Wrigley, (Wm) Jr (WWY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/apc/" rel="tag">Anadarko Petroleum (APC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says it's not a strong-dollar sell -- the story here is still too good.</span><br /><br />Why did natural gas go down last week? What was that? Inventories were down. The commodity price was up. The fuel itself is green. It is better than ethanol and it is being used to fuel an increasing numbers of cars and trucks. <br /><br />  The whole move down had to have been triggered by something, right? Yeah, how about the fact that the stocks were up a lot and were due for some profit-taking. <br /><br />  Recall that the real "reason" they went down is that the dollar "got strong," and that was supposed to trigger commodity deflation; natural gas is a commodity and is therefore going to go down. (Barron's made this very case this weekend, oblivious to the facts, but loving the theory.) <br /><br />  This kind of thinking is just so stupid that it shows you can get chance after chance after chance to own the fuel that can take care of the nation if we just let it. Of course, the stocks began to come back later in the week as threats of supply cut-offs of crude -- they came true this weekend -- made natural gas declines virtually impossible, despite the "sense" that it peaked. So the money has came back and I believe will continue to come back. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-nat-gas-dip-was-profit-taking-nothing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Nat gas dip was profit-taking, nothing more </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-nat-gas-dip-was-profit-taking-nothing/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Nat gas dip was profit-taking, nothing more </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-nat-gas-dip-was-profit-taking-nothing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1179366/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-nat-gas-dip-was-profit-taking-nothing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andarko</category><category>apa</category><category>apache</category><category>apc</category><category>buffett</category><category>chesapeake</category><category>chk</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>nabors</category><category>nbr</category><category>questar</category><category>southwestern</category><category>str</category><category>swn</category><category>ultra</category><category>upl</category><category>wrigley</category><category>wwy</category><category>xto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
