<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Mutual funds' biggest losers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mutual-funds-biggest-losers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mutual-funds-biggest-losers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mutual-funds-biggest-losers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>Kiplinger created a <a href="http://www.kiplinger.com/printstory.php?pid=12800">hall of shame for mutual funds </a>and you should definitely check it out to be sure you don't own one of these duds. You also want to be sure you don't buy any of them in the future. While some fund directors may get the hint and even find a good manager, the fact that they've got such poor records for so long means you couldn't even trust a turnaround attempt. The directors of these mutual fund groups are dropping the ball when it comes to oversight.</p>
<p>One pure disaster that Kiplinger highlights is the Franklin Real Estate Securities fund. This fund has been in the bottom 20% for one, three, five and ten years. To give you an idea of how out of touch with reality its board members are, the directors wrote in its annual report, "the Board found such performance to be acceptable." If that level of performance is acceptable to Franklin's board, I'd question their stewardship of all their funds.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mutual-funds-biggest-losers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mutual funds' biggest losers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mutual-funds-biggest-losers/">Mutual funds' biggest losers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.kiplinger.com/magazine/archives/2007/12/hallofshame.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mutual-funds-biggest-losers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1040714/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mutual-funds-biggest-losers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biggest losers</category><category>BiggestLosers</category><category>franklin real esate</category><category>FranklinRealEsate</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets</category><category>T.RowePriceEmergingMarkets</category><category>van wagoner emerging growth fund</category><category>Vanguard Emerging Markets</category><category>VanguardEmergingMarkets</category><category>VanWagonerEmergingGrowthFund</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:26:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
