<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Unsold foreign cars piling up at U.S. ports]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/unsold-foreign-cars-piling-up-at-u-s-ports/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/unsold-foreign-cars-piling-up-at-u-s-ports/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/unsold-foreign-cars-piling-up-at-u-s-ports/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/autosales.jpg" />It's rapidly becoming the world's largest parking lot. <br /><br />Is it the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_Bronx_Expressway">Cross Bronx Expressway</a> at 6 p.m.? No, it's the Long Beach, California port, which along with the Los Angeles port is rapidly becoming a defacto storage lot, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1"><span style="font-style: italic;">The New York Times</span> reported</a>, as thousands of unwanted, new foreign cars pile up, their future unknown. <br /><br />The reason? Foreign new car sales have plunged as consumers cut back spending amid the caution-inducing U.S. recession and unemployment levels rise, which historically has led to a decline in new car sales. New car dealers order cars months in advance but have the authority to reject delivery if demand declines. <br /><br />Further, if you thought only U.S. automakers <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) and Chrysler had lots and storage fields of unsold new cars, you're mistaken, so says economist Peter Dawson. <br /><br />"This recession is an equal-opportunity pain inflicter for auto manufacturers, and it's hitting foreign car manufacturers as well," Dawson said. "<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Toyota</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">TM</a>), Nissan, even Mercedes-Benz are seeing their inventories build, despite promotions and sales incentives."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/unsold-foreign-cars-piling-up-at-u-s-ports/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unsold foreign cars piling up at U.S. ports</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/unsold-foreign-cars-piling-up-at-u-s-ports/">Unsold foreign cars piling up at U.S. ports</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/unsold-foreign-cars-piling-up-at-u-s-ports/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1376688/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/unsold-foreign-cars-piling-up-at-u-s-ports/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sector</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>f</category><category>featured</category><category>gm</category><category>imports</category><category>tm</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An oil shock is hardly the global economy's best friend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/oklahoma-city-oil-derrick.jpg" alt="" />It would appear to be axiomatic to say that there are few benefits from an oil price over $100 per barrel. Nevertheless, during <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil's latest climb to the stratosphere</a>, some have argued that a high oil price is 'net-positive for the global economy,' or 'a long-term good thing.'<br /><br />Economist Glen Langan has a word for insta-analysis like the above. "Misguided," he calls them. <br /><br />Not that Langan is an ardent advocate of oil use; hardly. Would that the developed and developing world could shift today to an alternate, renewable, and more environmentally-friendly energy form, he says. But the world can't, and as is some times the case in social science circles, "the normative influences the empirical," he says, and leads to curious conclusions like an 'oil shock being net-positive for the global economy.' <br /><br />For the record: an oil shock is never net-positive for the global economy, Langan argues.<br /><br />There are some benefits, to be sure, such as increased conservation, increased research on alternate/renewable energy forms, a transfer of some wealth to some developing nations and, of course, astounding increases in wealth in those connected to oil and oil services, but the overall effect is net-negative. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> traded Thursday up $5.46 to $121.42 per barrel.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An oil shock is hardly the global economy's best friend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/">An oil shock is hardly the global economy's best friend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1291212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979-80 oil shock</category><category>alternate energy sources</category><category>Brazil</category><category>cars</category><category>China</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>EU</category><category>Europe</category><category>European Union</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>gdp</category><category>global economy</category><category>globalization</category><category>India</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>Russia</category><category>trade</category><category>transportation</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most likely, you'll determine the fuel for the car of the future]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gasoline-2.jpg" />Despite the onset of the latest high energy price era, it goes without saying that the car will remain the main mode of transportation in the United States as the 21st century progresses. <br /><br />First mass-produced on a national scale by <a href="http://www.thehenryford.org/">Henry Ford</a>, subsidized by the construction and expansion of the public interstate highway system after World War II, and immortalized by such films as George Lucas's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Graffiiti"><span style="font-style: italic;">American Graffit</span>i (1973)</a>, the car and car culture is intrinsic to modern American life. <br /><br /><strong>The car fuel alternatives</strong><br /><br />Cheap <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil</a> is not intrinsic, however, and that's a major reason why the nation is exploring car / vehicle fuel alternatives. Many options exist, each with strengths / weaknesses, and currently there's no clear winner. <br /><br />Hence, in a very real sense, your say in the matter will play an important role in determining what fuel most Americans will use for car transportation in the decades ahead. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Most likely, you'll determine the fuel for the car of the future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/">Most likely, you'll determine the fuel for the car of the future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1289975/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Graffiti</category><category>autos</category><category>climate change</category><category>electric cars</category><category>ethanol</category><category>featured</category><category>flex fuel cars</category><category>fuel cells</category><category>fuel efficiency</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>global warming</category><category>Henry Ford</category><category>hybrid cars</category><category>hybrids</category><category>hydrogen</category><category>hydrogen cars</category><category>interstate highways</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>mpg</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A good news, bad news saga regarding auto companies and fuel efficiency]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/a-good-news-bad-news-saga-regarding-auto-companies-and-fuel-eff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/a-good-news-bad-news-saga-regarding-auto-companies-and-fuel-eff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/a-good-news-bad-news-saga-regarding-auto-companies-and-fuel-eff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p>There's an upside and a downside regarding major auto companies and the quest to develop vehicles with increased fuel-efficiency. <br /><br />The upside: Auto makers are positioning themselves to carve out niches in fuel-efficient technology and design, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wall Street Journal</span> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121900598351747695.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">reported Monday</a> (subscription required).<br /><br />The downside: Auto makers appear to be exhibiting a 'herd mentality' on the current propulsion technology -- hybrid engine cars with both a modest electric power source and a mainstay internal combustion engine.<br /><strong><br />An electric hybrid focus</strong><br /><br />Following up on its successful electric-gasoline Prius hybrid, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) announced it will make hybrid engine systems available on all models by 2020, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Journal</span> reported. Meanwhile, Honda said it would import new hybrid technology to the U.S. to compete with Toyota and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) plans to double its hybrid lineup next year, and Chevrolet's (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">GM</a>) Volt hybrid that will go on sale in 2010.<br /><br />Economist David H. Wang said investors and consumers should not be overly optimistic or pessimistic regarding the sector's concentration on electric-fuel hybrids.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/a-good-news-bad-news-saga-regarding-auto-companies-and-fuel-eff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A good news, bad news saga regarding auto companies and fuel efficiency</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/a-good-news-bad-news-saga-regarding-auto-companies-and-fuel-eff/">A good news, bad news saga regarding auto companies and fuel efficiency</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121900598351747695.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/a-good-news-bad-news-saga-regarding-auto-companies-and-fuel-eff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1287439/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/a-good-news-bad-news-saga-regarding-auto-companies-and-fuel-eff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>electric cars</category><category>electric hybrids</category><category>ethanol</category><category>ethanol cars</category><category>f</category><category>flex fuel</category><category>ford</category><category>fuel efficiency</category><category>gm</category><category>honda</category><category>hybrids</category><category>hydrogen</category><category>hydrogen cars</category><category>inthenews</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>mpg</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>tm</category><category>toyota</category><category>vehicles</category><category>volt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amid oil's pull-back, U.S. gasoline prices fall ... but slowly]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/amid-oils-pull-back-u-s-gasoline-prices-fall-but-slowly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/amid-oils-pull-back-u-s-gasoline-prices-fall-but-slowly/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/amid-oils-pull-back-u-s-gasoline-prices-fall-but-slowly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gasoline-2.jpg" />For U.S. consumers, there's good news and bad news on the gasoline price front.<br /><br />First the good news: U.S. retail gasoline prices have fallen every day for about a month, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/11/news/economy/fuel/index.htm?postversion=2008081106">CNNMoney.com reported Monday,</a> citing motorist group AAA data. <br /><br />Now the bad news: Prices are not falling nearly as fast - - or as proportionately - - as they rose, given the same dollar-move in a barrel of oil.<br /><br />The AAA said the national, average price for a gallon of regular unleaded has fallen 30 cents to $3.81 from a record high of $4.11 set on July 16, 2008, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/11/news/economy/fuel/index.htm?postversion=2008081106">CNNMoney.com reported Monday.</a><br /><br /><strong>Gasoline prices: Quick to rise, slow to fall</strong><br /><br />However, during that time period <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil has fallen about $25</a> to roughly $115 per barrel. Given the roughly 2-cent to 2.5-cent move for every $1 move in the price of oil, gasoline prices should have fallen 50-62 cents per gallon. Why haven't they?<br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Monday the answer is complex and contains many variables, but the strongest factors today appear to be gasoline station cash flow, and profit maximization.<br /><br />As soon the price of oil increases, some gasoline stations will increase the price of gasoline, in anticipation of a price increase the oil company will institute for the next gasoline delivery, he said. "Failure to do so would create a monthly cash flow deficit for the gas station," Dawson said. "It's sort of like an additional monthly expense."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/amid-oils-pull-back-u-s-gasoline-prices-fall-but-slowly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amid oil's pull-back, U.S. gasoline prices fall ... but slowly</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/amid-oils-pull-back-u-s-gasoline-prices-fall-but-slowly/">Amid oil's pull-back, U.S. gasoline prices fall ... but slowly</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/amid-oils-pull-back-u-s-gasoline-prices-fall-but-slowly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1281205/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/amid-oils-pull-back-u-s-gasoline-prices-fall-but-slowly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAA</category><category>cars</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>travel</category><category>vacations</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Transportation issues will be critical to the health of 21st century U.S. economy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/transportation-likely-to-loom-large-in-21st-century-u-s-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/transportation-likely-to-loom-large-in-21st-century-u-s-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/transportation-likely-to-loom-large-in-21st-century-u-s-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Given the smorgasbord of economic demands and concerns -- domestic and foreign -- likely to face the new U.S. president, investors (and taxpayers) can justifiably ask 'Where's all the money going to come from to pay for these programs?' <br /><br />Legitimate question, but one, for now, we'll let the political process sort out. (Current <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/109312/Gallup-Daily-Obama-46-McCain-44.aspx">Gallup Daily Tracking Poll</a> as of August 6, 2008, for the U.S. presidential election: Obama, 46%, McCain, 44%.)<br /><br />Electing <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/splash/">U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois,</a> or <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/">U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona,</a> will produce different programs and revenue priorities, due to the parties' different sources of power, but the argument forwarded here is that -- regardless of who becomes the new president -- the office holder should address transportation in a comprehensive way. Here are the major concern areas: <br />
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mass transit:</span> We're early into the $4 gas era, of course, but initial U.S. Department of Transportation data indicates Americans are driving less and using mass transit more. The trouble is, many mass transit systems (rail, commuter rail, subway, bus) need to be expanded/upgraded to handle the increased ridership. Bigger, better mass transit systems will save the United States hundreds of billions of dollars in oil costs, not to mention the environmental benefits.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/transportation-likely-to-loom-large-in-21st-century-u-s-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Transportation issues will be critical to the health of 21st century U.S. economy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/transportation-likely-to-loom-large-in-21st-century-u-s-economy/">Transportation issues will be critical to the health of 21st century U.S. economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/transportation-likely-to-loom-large-in-21st-century-u-s-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1278401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/transportation-likely-to-loom-large-in-21st-century-u-s-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airlines</category><category>airports</category><category>buses</category><category>business travel</category><category>cars</category><category>climate change</category><category>commercial aviation</category><category>commuter rail</category><category>electric cars</category><category>environment</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>gdp</category><category>hybrids</category><category>leisure travel</category><category>mass transit</category><category>McCain</category><category>natural gas vehicles</category><category>Obama</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OPEC</category><category>railroads</category><category>subways</category><category>transportation</category><category>travel</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pickens Plan: One piece in U.S. transportation energy puzzle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/pickens-plan-one-piece-in-u-s-transportation-energy-puzzle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/pickens-plan-one-piece-in-u-s-transportation-energy-puzzle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/pickens-plan-one-piece-in-u-s-transportation-energy-puzzle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/boonepickens.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
Billionaire oilman T. Boone Pickens <a href="http://www.pickensplan.com/">has launched a new campaign</a> to substitute at least a portion of the U.S. imported oil with domestic natural gas. <br /><br />Pickens would like renewable energy sources, wind power chief among them, to run electric power generation plants currently run by natural gas/coal, and use that natural gas to fuel natural gas vehicles.<br /><br />Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Thursday the <a href="http://www.pickensplan.com/">PickensPlan</a> is commendable for a number of reasons (it would lower the trade deficit, create domestic jobs, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions), but investors and readers should not view it as a panacea for the nation's transportation energy bill. "It could be a part of the solution, but it won't address the entire imported oil problem," Langan said. <br /><br /><strong>Another oil saver: better engines</strong><br /><br />What's another key to reducing both imported oil and U.S.-produced oil consumption? Something that the U.S. auto sector has under-emphasized for more than a decade: technology-driven increases in car/vehicle efficiency, Langan said.<br /><br />Langan said vehicle weight reduction, transmission/drive train improvements, enhanced aerodynamics, and the biggest factor -- increased engine efficiency -- "have the potential to reduce oil imports by almost as much as the Pickens Plan, and the changes won't take 10 years to see the results."<br /><br />Further, many of the mpg-enchancing technologies already exist, Langan notes; he suggested an additional federal tax credit for automakers to help them incorporate the changes sooner. <br /><br />"The fleet [all vehicles driven in the U.S.] should average 25-27 miles per gallon right now. Currently we're at about 20 miles per gallon. With appropriate federal tax credits we could be at 30-32 miles per gallon in five or seven years," Langan said. <br /><strong><br /></strong><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/pickens-plan-one-piece-in-u-s-transportation-energy-puzzle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pickens Plan: One piece in U.S. transportation energy puzzle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/pickens-plan-one-piece-in-u-s-transportation-energy-puzzle/">Pickens Plan: One piece in U.S. transportation energy puzzle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://featured>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/pickens-plan-one-piece-in-u-s-transportation-energy-puzzle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1266131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/pickens-plan-one-piece-in-u-s-transportation-energy-puzzle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>electric cars</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>imports</category><category>mpg</category><category>natural gas cars</category><category>natural gas vehicles</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OilShock</category><category>Pickens</category><category>Pickens Plan</category><category>T. Boone Pickens</category><category>trade</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>vehicles</category><category>wind power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. automakers discover that size matters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/u-s-automakers-discover-that-size-matters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/u-s-automakers-discover-that-size-matters/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/u-s-automakers-discover-that-size-matters/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fordmotorcompany/1432583751/in/set-72157602133451756/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/ford-focus.jpg" alt="" /></a>With the U.S. economy in slow-growth / no-growth mode, domestic demand for autos has been low, as predicted. However, almost on cue, demand for smaller vehicles has been robust.<br /><br />That cue is $4 gasoline, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/business/20auto.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1213960257-JtXxDxRAgCvhmP6sPqJRLQ"><span style="font-style: italic;">The New York Times</span> reported Friday</a>. Or, as one Harrison, N.Y. resident called her monthly gasoline bill, "My car payment in addition to my car payment."<br /><br /> A 60-70% increase in gasoline prices in the last two years has led to a large increase in demand for small cars and hybrids, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/business/20auto.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1213960257-JtXxDxRAgCvhmP6sPqJRLQ"><span style="font-style: italic;">The Times</span> reported</a>, with limited supply of some of the most-preferred models creating further frustration for automakers and purchasers alike. <br /><strong><br />The more things change...</strong><br /><br />Economist Glen Langan said a great deal has changed during the time between the last oil shock in 1979-80 and today's oil shock: long hair for men is out, as are bell-bottom pants, and album-oriented rock (mainly because there are no more record albums). One thing hasn't changed: U.S. automakers, once again, "were dramatically under-prepared for the high gas price era." <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/business/20auto.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1213960257-JtXxDxRAgCvhmP6sPqJRLQ"></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/u-s-automakers-discover-that-size-matters/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. automakers discover that size matters</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/u-s-automakers-discover-that-size-matters/">U.S. automakers discover that size matters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/business/20auto.html?_r=2&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1213960257-JtXxDxRAgCvhmP6sPqJRLQ&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/u-s-automakers-discover-that-size-matters/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1231469/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/u-s-automakers-discover-that-size-matters/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1979-80 energy crisis</category><category>1979-80EnergyCrisis</category><category>auto sector</category><category>cars</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>hybrids</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kerkorian increases Ford stake to 6.5%, buys another 20 million shares]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/kerkorian-increases-ford-stake-to-6-5-buys-another-20-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/kerkorian-increases-ford-stake-to-6-5-buys-another-20-million/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/kerkorian-increases-ford-stake-to-6-5-buys-another-20-million/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/ford-f-logo.jpg" />What does Kirk Kerkorian know that others on Wall Street don't know?<br /> <br /> That was one analyst's meditation after the billionaire investor's Tracinda Corp. indicated in an SEC filing that it has increased its stake in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) by about 20 million shares to a 6.49% stake from 5.5%, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/kerkorian-increases-stake-in-ford-to-649/n20080619074409990014">The Associated Press reported Thursday.</a> Tracinda now owns 140.8 million shares of Ford.<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br /><br /></span> Ford's shares were virtually unchanged on the news, gaining 5 cents to $6.27 in Thursday morning trading.<br /> <br /> Kerkorian now owns 140.8 million shares in the U.S. automaker, and stock analyst C. Leonard Bauer said Kerkorian is either venturing forth where no seasoned investor would go, or is on to something.<br /> <strong><br /> A high-risk investment</strong><br /> <br /> "On its face, this is a high-risk stake, a calculation that could hurt dearly. There's not a lot running in Ford's favor right now, from an operational standpoint," Bauer said. "Ford wants us to believe their transformation is progressing reasonably well, but it isn't. I've seen little in Ford's fleet or prototypes that suggest a whole new generation of young adults will suddenly run out and buy Fords, and they are still behind-the-curve on efficiency, styling, innovation, and must-have vehicles." Bauer added that he does not have a rating on nor own shares in Ford.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/kerkorian-increases-ford-stake-to-6-5-buys-another-20-million/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kerkorian increases Ford stake to 6.5%, buys another 20 million shares</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/kerkorian-increases-ford-stake-to-6-5-buys-another-20-million/">Kerkorian increases Ford stake to 6.5%, buys another 20 million shares</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/kerkorian-increases-ford-stake-to-6-5-buys-another-20-million/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1230371/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/kerkorian-increases-ford-stake-to-6-5-buys-another-20-million/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sector</category><category>autos</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kerkorian</category><category>Kirk Kerkorian</category><category>Tracinda Corp.</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Up ahead: A hybrid in your near future, not a pure electric car]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/up-ahead-a-hybrid-in-your-near-future-not-a-pure-electric-car/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/up-ahead-a-hybrid-in-your-near-future-not-a-pure-electric-car/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/up-ahead-a-hybrid-in-your-near-future-not-a-pure-electric-car/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/hybrid-vehicle.jpg" />With the oil and refining sectors providing evidence that $4 per gallon gasoline may represent a floor, auto makers are beefing-up efforts to improve and introduce electric cars, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/electric-cars-plug-washington/story.aspx?guid=%7B4BD69576%2DACAA%2D4640%2D83EB%2D46C63868BF25%7D">MarketWatch reported Wednesday</a>. <br /><br />While the new wave of hybrids and electric cars will emphasize plug-in technology (the ability to recharge the car's battery from a standard 110-volt outlet), industry executives and think tank analysts underscored that a series of government incentives and programs will be needed to enable large-scale production of plug-in hybrids and electric cars. Selected automakers have set the 2010 model year as a target for rolling out the new cars en masse.<strong><br /></strong><br />Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Wednesday the automakers' roll-out timetable may be a tad optimistic. <br /><br />"What we're seeing now from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) and others is that classic, delayed, rush-to-the-future response so typical of a sector that's behind," Langan said. "U.S. auto makers and others should have developed at least a hybrid that could compete with gas engines 10 years ago. But they chose not to and battery technology is behind as a result. I don't think we will see a cost-effective plug-in electric in 2010, and we'll be fortunate if a cost-effective, plug-in hybrid will be in mass production by 2012 or 2013."<strong> </strong><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/up-ahead-a-hybrid-in-your-near-future-not-a-pure-electric-car/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Up ahead: A hybrid in your near future, not a pure electric car</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/up-ahead-a-hybrid-in-your-near-future-not-a-pure-electric-car/">Up ahead: A hybrid in your near future, not a pure electric car</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/electric-cars-plug-washington/story.aspx?guid=%7B4BD69576%2DACAA%2D4640%2D83EB%2D46C63868BF25%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/up-ahead-a-hybrid-in-your-near-future-not-a-pure-electric-car/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1229356/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/up-ahead-a-hybrid-in-your-near-future-not-a-pure-electric-car/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>carbon emissions</category><category>climate change</category><category>diesel prices</category><category>electric cars</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>hybrids</category><category>lithium ion</category><category>lithium ion batteries</category><category>mpg</category><category>new cars</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Department projects $4 gas for as far as the eye can see]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/u-s-energy-department-projects-4-gas-for-as-far-as-the-eye-can/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/u-s-energy-department-projects-4-gas-for-as-far-as-the-eye-can/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/u-s-energy-department-projects-4-gas-for-as-far-as-the-eye-can/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/regaul_vpower_gas.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This energy fact will not be a revelation to American motorists: <br /><br />The U.S. Energy Department now forecasts that gasoline prices will remain high -- around $4 per gallon -- this year and next, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/get-used-to-4-gas-government-says/20080611141009990003">The Associated Press reported Wednesday.<br /></a><br />The Energy Department's Guy Caruso, head of the department's Energy Information Administration wing, announced the revised forecast in testimony before a U.S. House of Representatives committee, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/get-used-to-4-gas-government-says/20080611141009990003">The AP reported.</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html">The EIA now expects</a> the average U.S. gasoline price, currently over $4 per gallon, to peak at $4.15 per gallon in August. Regular-grade gasoline, which typically is 87 octane at U.S. gas stations, is expected to average $3.78 per gallon in 2008, or 97 cents above the 2007 average price.<br /><br />Nevertheless, <a href="http://www.newyorkgasprices.com/retail_price_chart.aspx">many high-cost U.S. cities</a> -- including New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Boston -- are already experiencing gasoline prices in the $4.20-$4.60 per gallon range, with selected areas approaching $5 per gallon. <br /><br />Moreover, the steady rise in gasoline prices is occurring despite the fact that weekly U.S. gasoline consumption has declined, on a year-over-year basis, for more than four months. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/u-s-energy-department-projects-4-gas-for-as-far-as-the-eye-can/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Energy Department projects $4 gas for as far as the eye can see</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/u-s-energy-department-projects-4-gas-for-as-far-as-the-eye-can/">U.S. Energy Department projects $4 gas for as far as the eye can see</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/u-s-energy-department-projects-4-gas-for-as-far-as-the-eye-can/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1223664/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/u-s-energy-department-projects-4-gas-for-as-far-as-the-eye-can/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cars</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>energy crisis</category><category>Energy Information Administration</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mpg</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kerkorian finds many willing sellers of Ford's shares]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/kerkorian-finds-many-willing-sellers-of-fords-shares/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/kerkorian-finds-many-willing-sellers-of-fords-shares/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/kerkorian-finds-many-willing-sellers-of-fords-shares/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/logo---ford-color.jpg" alt="" />Shareholders tendered billionaire investor Kirk Kirkorian 1.02 billion shares -- almost half of Ford's shares outstanding -- on growing concern that CEO Alan Mulally's turnaround plan won't work, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aNu2rOLdUA9I&amp;refer=us">Bloomberg News reported Tuesday.</a><br /><br />Kerkorian is seeking and will buy an additional 20 million shares at $8.50 per share to add to his existing 100 million shares, held by his Tracinda Corp., <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/kerkorians-ford-tender-attracts-huge/n20080610075309990034">The Associated Press reported Tuesday.</a> Prior to the 20-million share tender, Kerkorian's average share cost was $6.91.<br /><br />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) fell 19 cents to $6.17 in Tuesday afternoon trading.
<p>"I guess one can call Kerkorian's latest tender sufficiently oversubscribed," said C. Leonard Bauer, independent stock analyst. "Seriously, the flood of shareholders willing to sell is investors' statement regarding Ford's remake. It's a sign their's deep doubt regarding the near-term probability of a return on investment. A price of $8.50 looks like a pretty good price for Ford's shares right now." Bauer added that he does not have a rating on nor own shares in Ford.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/kerkorian-finds-many-willing-sellers-of-fords-shares/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kerkorian finds many willing sellers of Ford's shares</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/kerkorian-finds-many-willing-sellers-of-fords-shares/">Kerkorian finds many willing sellers of Ford's shares</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/kerkorian-finds-many-willing-sellers-of-fords-shares/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1221130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/kerkorian-finds-many-willing-sellers-of-fords-shares/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sector</category><category>autos</category><category>diesel prices</category><category>energy crisis</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>Kerkorian</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Automakers' Battle: TM vs. GM]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/automakers-battle-tm-vs-gm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/automakers-battle-tm-vs-gm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/automakers-battle-tm-vs-gm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/logo_toyota.jpg" />Despite a challenging economic environment, Japanese automaker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) has been continuing its strong competition with rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) for the title of the world's largest automaker. As results show, the good times are rolling for Toyota which earlier today posted an <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/toyota-takes-1q-world-sales-lead-from/n20080423102909990050">increase of 2.7% for its global sales</a>, for a total of 2.41 million vehicles during the first-quarter. <br /><br />On the other side of the coin, GM announced a decline of almost 1% in its total sales. Last year, General Motors held the crown in global sales, but on the other hand Toyota was the leader in global vehicle production. Both companies benefited from strong demand outside the United States.<br /><br />General Motors has said that strong overseas sales weren't enough to overcome a weak North American market. The company saw a 10% drop in first-quarter sales in its home <location>North American</location> market as high fuel prices and worries about housing and the credit crunch pressured consumers. Regardless of the weak results, GM restated its desire to "win, and we'd like to be No. 1 in sales at the end of the year."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/automakers-battle-tm-vs-gm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Automakers' Battle: TM vs. GM</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/automakers-battle-tm-vs-gm/">Automakers' Battle: TM vs. GM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/automakers-battle-tm-vs-gm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1175493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/automakers-battle-tm-vs-gm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car sales</category><category>CarSales</category><category>fuel</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tm</category><category>Toyota Motor</category><category>ToyotaMotor</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A few investor, consumer tactics for the $4 gasoline era]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/14/a-few-investor-consumer-tactics-for-the-4-gasoline-era/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/14/a-few-investor-consumer-tactics-for-the-4-gasoline-era/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/14/a-few-investor-consumer-tactics-for-the-4-gasoline-era/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>With the national average of unleaded regular gasoline above $3.15 and oil's recent price surge not fully felt by refiners yet, there's a good chance gasoline will hit $4 per gallon this summer in the United States, particularly if driving patterns mirror previous summers. <br /><br />Moreover, gasoline is already above $4 in certain high-cost zones in California and in Hawaii, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/maui-drivers-watch-gas-prices-reach-4/n20080314074109990008">the Associated Press reported Friday.</a> <br /><br />What's a good way to cope with the above? Turn it your advantage, to the extent possible, at both ends. Accordingly, here are a few tactics for investors and consumers in the $4 gasoline era.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/14/a-few-investor-consumer-tactics-for-the-4-gasoline-era/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A few investor, consumer tactics for the $4 gasoline era</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/14/a-few-investor-consumer-tactics-for-the-4-gasoline-era/">A few investor, consumer tactics for the $4 gasoline era</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/14/a-few-investor-consumer-tactics-for-the-4-gasoline-era/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1140495/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/14/a-few-investor-consumer-tactics-for-the-4-gasoline-era/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>cars</category><category>gas mileage</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>mpg</category><category>Oceaneering</category><category>OII</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil services sector</category><category>RIG</category><category>Transocean</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota (TM) keeps strong competition with GM]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/toyota-tm-keeps-strong-competition-with-gm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/toyota-tm-keeps-strong-competition-with-gm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/toyota-tm-keeps-strong-competition-with-gm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/toyota-tm-logo.jpg" alt="" /> </a>This morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) posted a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/toyota-in-tight-race-for-no-1-with-gm/n20080110030909990010">rise of 6% for its global group sales</a> to a total of 9.37 million vehicles last year. The company's results put increased pressure on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) for the title of the world's largest automaker. <br /><br />General Motor hasn't announced yet its annual sales results, but analysts expect the company show 2007 sales of 9.3 million vehicles. As we can see, the sales numbers suggest a tight race in the company's fight for the biggest automaker in global sales. <br /><br />The recent surge in oil prices helped Toyota to increase sales of its more fuel efficient cars, such as the Camry sedan and the Prius gas-electric hybrid models. General Motors has been able to keep the top industry spot for the past 76 years.<em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/toyota-tm-keeps-strong-competition-with-gm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota (TM) keeps strong competition with GM</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/toyota-tm-keeps-strong-competition-with-gm/">Toyota (TM) keeps strong competition with GM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/toyota-in-tight-race-for-no-1-with-gm/n20080110030909990010>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/toyota-tm-keeps-strong-competition-with-gm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1083219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/toyota-tm-keeps-strong-competition-with-gm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>competition</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>sales</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Democratic-led Congress seen hiking mpg standards]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>With the U.S. Federal Appeals Court of San Francisco's ruling that threw out proposed fuel economy standards, look for a renewed effort by the current U.S. Congress to pass new, tougher standards, possibly by year's end, a source familiar with various lobbying groups told Bloggingstocks. <br /><br />Based in Washington and familiar with Democratic Party and energy-issue constituencies, the source told Bloggingstocks that some legislation, albeit minor, was now likely. <br /><br />"Don't expect miracles, but the public sentiment and Congressional support appears to be there for a modest increase in <a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Corporate+Average+Fuel+Economy">CAFE</a> [<a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Corporate+Average+Fuel+Economy">Corporate Average Fuel Economy</a>] standard," he said, speaking on condition that he not be identified by name. He added that to-date the Bush Administration has resisted raising the CAFE; if the administration does so again, it's unclear whether Congress would have the votes to override the veto.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Democratic-led Congress seen hiking mpg standards</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/">Democratic-led Congress seen hiking mpg standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1044055/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>CAFE</category><category>cars</category><category>Chrylser</category><category>corporate average fuel economy</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesel prices</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>light trucks</category><category>MPG</category><category>sport utility vehicles</category><category>SUVs</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors (GM) launches joint venture in ex-Soviet territory]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/general-motors-gm-begins-joint-venture-in-ex-soviet-territtory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/general-motors-gm-begins-joint-venture-in-ex-soviet-territtory/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/general-motors-gm-begins-joint-venture-in-ex-soviet-territtory/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/gm-logo-(resized-250).jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) will be joining up with a former Soviet territory to produce and sell Chevy-branded vehicles. GM and <span style="font-style: italic;">Uzavtosanoat</span> (located in Uzbekistan) <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8S5QOBG0.htm">have signed a partnership agreement for a joint venture that will target consumers in that middle-Asian country.</a> Initially, the joint venture is projected to produce about 250,000 cars annually.<br /><br />GM continues to invest in emerging markets worldwide to offset sale problems here in its domestic market, and this should be a good move for the auto giant. The ex-Soviet republic had a falling out with the U.S. over a 2005 citizen uprising (and human rights violations <span style="font-style: italic;">en masse</span>) in Andijan, but has warmed back to American business with this rather large partnership.<br /><br />The GM/Uzbekistan joint partnership will take advantage of a plant that exists in the town of Asaka where Uzavtosanoat already has a factory that recently operated as part of a joint venture with the failed South Korean automaker Daewoo. Ironically, that plant already assembles cars from shipped-in assembly kits supplied by -- GM . well, GM Daewoo Auto &amp; Technology Company, anyway. GM Daewoo is the South Korean unit of the auto giant which happened as a result of <a href="http://consumeraffairs.com/news02/daewoo.html">GM's buying Daewoo's assets</a> over five years ago.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/general-motors-gm-begins-joint-venture-in-ex-soviet-territtory/">General Motors (GM) launches joint venture in ex-Soviet territory</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8S5QOBG0.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/general-motors-gm-begins-joint-venture-in-ex-soviet-territtory/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1009764/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/general-motors-gm-begins-joint-venture-in-ex-soviet-territtory/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>building</category><category>general</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>joint</category><category>motors</category><category>production</category><category>Uzbekistan</category><category>vehicles</category><category>venture</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Natural Gas Vehicles: Cleaner, cheaper and available]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/natural-gas-vehicles-cleaner-cheaper-and-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/natural-gas-vehicles-cleaner-cheaper-and-available/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/natural-gas-vehicles-cleaner-cheaper-and-available/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/aol-fly-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>With the price of fuel growing each week, the search for America's next energy alternative grows even stronger. WR Hambrecht looked at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clean-energy-fuels-corp/clne/nas">Clean Energy Fuels</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clean-energy-fuels-corp/clne/nas">CLNE</a>), a California-based supplier of liquid &amp; natural gas for vehicles, and they think they found a hidden gem. <br /><br />Clean Energy provides solutions for fleets to run on natural gas as an alternative to gasoline or diesel. The company currently operates in 10 states and Canada, with plans to begin operation in Peru later this year. The first quarter of 2007 was the company's first profitable quarter since 2001, generating revenues by selling compressed natural gas, liquid natural gas, and to a lesser extent, by building, operating and maintaining fueling stations. They currently serve over 200 commercial fleets with 13,000 natural gas vehicles, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/waste-management-inc/wmi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Waste Management Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/waste-management-inc/wmi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WMI</a>), Enterprise Rent-a-Car, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">UPS Inc's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">UPS</a>) fleet in Dallas and the Port of Los Angeles.<br /><br />The key to Clean Energy's success lies in the continued increase in crude prices and the public's desire for cheaper alternatives. According to Hambrecht, natural gas vehicles emit "50-70% fewer emissions, save $5,000-$17,000 in fuel costs annually and use widely distributed and domestically available natural gas" compared to the standard vehicles used to day.<br /><br />Not a bad start.<br /><br />Clean Energy is currently in its growth phase and Hambrecht initiated coverage of the alternative energy stock with a Buy rating and an $18 target. They project the company to earn $0.03 in 2007 and $0.23 in 2008. Hambrecht believes Clean Energy's valuation, currently up $0.12 to $13.00 in mid-day trading, doesn't take into account the upside potential from the natural gas vehicle roll-out and estimates an addressable market over $20 billion. <br /><br />With gas prices rising so fast, there's no reason natural gas should not be outfitted for commercial vehicles, but for the general populace as well.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/natural-gas-vehicles-cleaner-cheaper-and-available/">Natural Gas Vehicles: Cleaner, cheaper and available</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/natural-gas-vehicles-cleaner-cheaper-and-available/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/933769/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/natural-gas-vehicles-cleaner-cheaper-and-available/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy</category><category>AlternativeEnergy</category><category>analyst</category><category>clean energy</category><category>clean energy fuels</category><category>CleanEnergy</category><category>CleanEnergyFuels</category><category>clne</category><category>enterprise</category><category>fuel</category><category>gas</category><category>green</category><category>hambrecht</category><category>initiation</category><category>oil</category><category>ups</category><category>vehicles</category><category>waste management</category><category>WasteManagement</category><category>wmi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eight cars bound for steep depreciation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/22/eight-cars-bound-for-steep-depreciation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/22/eight-cars-bound-for-steep-depreciation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/22/eight-cars-bound-for-steep-depreciation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="130" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/durango.jpg" alt="" />I may never hear the word "depreciate" without thinking of the late great Michael Hutchence and the INXS half-single, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL7FY7rwVtQ">"Mediate."</a> Anyway...</p>
<p>After consulting <em>Kelly Blue Book,</em> arguably the expert on the subject of used cars, <em>Forbes </em>released its list of the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/vehicles/2007/03/17/cars-value-lose-forbeslife-cx_dl_0319losevalue.html?partner=aoltix">eight worst new-model vehicles</a> in terms of projected depreciation. Claiming the dubious top spot is the Buick Ranier SUV. With a base price of $32,285, the vehicle, made by General Motors (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GM</a>), is expected to retain just 42% of its value after two years. Five years out, the Ranier will be worth about 26% of its purchase price. The Dodge Caravan Minivan, a DaimlerChrysler (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/daimlerchrysler-ag/dcx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DCX</a>) vehicle that I'm fairly certain half of my new-Mom friends have purchased in the past 12 months, starts with a base of $19,770 but will keep just 41% of this value 24 months later. Third is the Dodge Durango SUV (pictured, right), with a base price of $27,055 and projected value retention of 38% after two years.</p>
<p>Rounding out the top eight:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Ford (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) Crown Victoria Sedan </li>
    <li>Ford E-Series Van </li>
    <li>Kia Amanti Sedan </li>
    <li>Kia Spectra Compact </li>
    <li>Ford Mercury Grand Marquis </li>
</ul>
<p>Stay tuned for tips on smart shopping for a vehicle that won't utterly disappoint when it becomes time to trade it in ... </p>
<p><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/22/eight-cars-bound-for-steep-depreciation/">Eight cars bound for steep depreciation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/22/eight-cars-bound-for-steep-depreciation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/857835/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/22/eight-cars-bound-for-steep-depreciation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobiles</category><category>buick</category><category>car buying</category><category>CarBuying</category><category>cars</category><category>depriciation</category><category>dodge</category><category>kelly blue book</category><category>KellyBlueBook</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
