<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[YouTube's advertising model goes traditional]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/youtubes-advertising-model-goes-traditional/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/youtubes-advertising-model-goes-traditional/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/youtubes-advertising-model-goes-traditional/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/yt.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />When Tom talked about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/googles-1-7-billion-youtube-deal-going-down-the-tubes/">failure to properly monetize YouTube</a>, he questioned if Google's purchase of the world's largest video-sharing site was a mistake. In relative terms, Google's use of stock to purchase YouTube was a short-term impact more than anything. But he's right -- YouTube still has not found a secret sauce to monetize the huge amount of video traffic being sent to and viewed from the site every second of the day.<br /><br />What has taken Google <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-9986202-93.html">two years to figure out here</a>? YouTube has been a playground for testing different online video monetization methods, but none of them have really worked. YouTube started out as a grassroots video-sharing site, and as its customer base has grown, it's one area where ads continually have been shunned by its viewers. So, Google may be giving up and going to a traditional method of selling advertising on YouTube: the pre-roll and post-roll ad video clip.<br /><br />This model has been used on news websites and most other types of video sites with success. It's a model that works. Plug in a 10-second or 15-second video in front of (and following) a customer-requested video clip and that advertising model works. Publishers have to keep them short (10 seconds is optimal), of course. So far, Google has shunned this kind of traditional video advertising on YouTube. But, as the Wall Street Journal reported this week, it may be ready to forge ahead with this model. It needs to get a respectable amount of revenue from YouTube somehow, because now, it's not.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/youtubes-advertising-model-goes-traditional/">YouTube's advertising model goes traditional</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-9986202-93.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/youtubes-advertising-model-goes-traditional/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1250948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/youtubes-advertising-model-goes-traditional/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Ads</category><category>GoogleAds</category><category>Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pre-roll</category><category>Video advertising</category><category>VideoAdvertising</category><category>YouTube</category><category>YouTube ads</category><category>YoutubeAds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Henry Blodget blasts Mary Meeker's Google (GOOG) math]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/henry-blodget-blasts-mary-meekers-google-goog-math/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/henry-blodget-blasts-mary-meekers-google-goog-math/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/henry-blodget-blasts-mary-meekers-google-goog-math/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p>                    When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley's</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"> MS</a>) veteran Internet analyst Mary Meeker estimated that  overlay ads on YouTube could immediately add $4.8 billion in gross revenue and $720 million in net revenue to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google's Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>), her one-time competitor Henry Blodget was puzzled.</p>
<p>                    Her figures were dramatically bigger than his estimate of $12 million to $360 million of gross revenue. As Blodget discusses in his <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/mary-meekers-yo.html">Silcon Alley Insider</a> blog, Meeker made a huge mathematical blunder. She didn't calculate her estimates using cost per thousands (CPM), the common measurement used in selling advertising. She just forgot to divide by a thousand. So instead of $4.8 billion, Meeker really meant to say $4.8 million and $720 million becomes $720,000.</p>
<p>                    These ads are insignificant to Google's bottom line.</p>
<p>                     Blodget, who is turning out to be more honest as a blogger than he was as an analyst,  clearly is delighting in jabbing the Internet Queen Meeker. It's odd that no one on her team caught this mistake before it was published.</p>
<p>                      Investors need to remember that analysts often are wrong.  When they guess too low, as Wall Street often has with Google, it's called an "upside surprise" and when they guess too high it's called a "disappointment."  This is a game that Blodget knows very well.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/henry-blodget-blasts-mary-meekers-google-goog-math/">Henry Blodget blasts Mary Meeker's Google (GOOG) math</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/mary-meekers-yo.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/henry-blodget-blasts-mary-meekers-google-goog-math/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/972788/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/henry-blodget-blasts-mary-meekers-google-goog-math/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>goog</category><category>henry blodget</category><category>HenryBlodget</category><category>mary meeker</category><category>MaryMeeker</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>video advertising</category><category>VideoAdvertising</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street analysts</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetAnalysts</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google continues push into video ads]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/07/google-continues-push-into-video-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/07/google-continues-push-into-video-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/07/google-continues-push-into-video-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p>According to a report at TechCrunch, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is working on <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/06/video-ads-somebody-needs-to-solve-this-problem/">programs that will drive adoption of video advertising online</a>. CPMs, the rate that advertisers charge customers, are estimated to be over $40 for online video. This is much higher than the rate for simple banners.</p>
<p>Google obviously has an edge, if it can come up with a program that both advertisers and content companies will accept. Due to its ownership of YouTube and Google Video, the company has the largest audience for video content. What it still lacks is a broadly accepted program to move TV advertising to the web.</p>
<p>One of the issues facing Google and competitors is whether people are willing to watch ads that are much longer than 10 or 15 seconds. Longer ads clearly offer a better opportunity to explain product features, but if web visitors will not take the time, it does not matter.</p>
<p>The other substantial problem is where the ads go. Do they belong in the programming or in some other spot on the web page.</p>
<p>With display advertising growth rates slowing and text search ads reaching a level where their year-over-year numbers are likely to be less robust, the battle for internet revenue may well turn to video.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/07/google-continues-push-into-video-ads/">Google continues push into video ads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Jul 2007 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/07/google-continues-push-into-video-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/935047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/07/google-continues-push-into-video-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad placement</category><category>advertising online</category><category>CPM</category><category>display advertising</category><category>DisplayAdvertising</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Video</category><category>online video</category><category>TechCrunch</category><category>text ads</category><category>TV advertising</category><category>TvAdvertising</category><category>video advertising</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google: new video ads likely to hit big]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/google-new-video-ads-likely-to-hit-big/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/google-new-video-ads-likely-to-hit-big/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/google-new-video-ads-likely-to-hit-big/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/taulli/151750457/"><img height="158" alt="googvideo" src="http://static.flickr.com/50/151750457_fcc39b2440_o.jpg" width="240" align="right" /></a></p>
<p><br />The knock against <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> is that its ad business is mostly text-based.&nbsp;Then again, it is a highly lucrative business - that others like <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> and <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a> wish they could excel at.</p>
<p>However, Google realizes that, in order to continue its growth, the company needs to bring on board more mainstream advertisers.&nbsp;This means going away from text ads - and venturing into branding.</p>
<p>It's not an easy transition.&nbsp; But this week, Google is making a big step in that direction.&nbsp;That is, in its AdSense program, there will now be video ads.</p>
<p>But there is an interesting twist. The ads will not play automatically; that is, the user must click on the ad.&nbsp; Hence, it is "click and play" advertising. </p>
<p>I talked to Greg Sterling (who, by the way, got back to me at 11pm tonight), who is the founding principal of Sterling Market Intelligence, a consulting and research firm focused on online consumer and advertiser behavior.&nbsp; His assessment so far:&nbsp; "I haven't seen the ads in action so I can only comment in the abstract about the model. But it combines reach and performance-based targeting for video in ways that are going to be appealing to brand advertisers."</p>
<p>While Yahoo! certainly has had much more experience in branding ads, the company may be a bit too traditional in its approaches.&nbsp;Here, in the case of Google, it is offering a unique method to video advertising.&nbsp; And it is leveraging its incredible AdSense technology that has already proven to be quite successful.</p>
<p><br />Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taulli.com/taullicom/2006/05/google_click_to.html">My interview with Greg Sterling</a></p>
<p>Greg Sterling - <a href="http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/05/23/google-click-to-play-video/ ">Blog Post</a> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/google-new-video-ads-likely-to-hit-big/">Google: new video ads likely to hit big</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 May 2006 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/google-new-video-ads-likely-to-hit-big/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620862/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/google-new-video-ads-likely-to-hit-big/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Video advertising</category><category>VideoAdvertising</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
