<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: So-called revelations re-establish the bear ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-so-called-revelations-re-establish-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-so-called-revelations-re-establish-the/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-so-called-revelations-re-establish-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10478865/1/coming-week-bull-or-bear-market.html?puc=aoljjc">Coming Week: Bull or Bear Market? </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10479053/1/gm-chrysler-get-last-chance-to-prove-viable.html?puc=aoljjc">GM, Chrysler Get Last Chance to Prove Viable </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says some of the latest gains could be lost, but it's not disaster -- it's business as usual. </span><br />  <br />How did people think this saga with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GM">Cramer's Take</a>) was going to end, with Rick Wagoner receiving the Congressional Medal of Car Building?  <br /><br />  Did anyone think that the company was actually going to turn around? Did anyone want Wagoner's GM to continue to get money? Did anyone think he was actually doing a good job?  <br /><br />  How about the bad news out of the G-20? No stimulus. Did anyone really think that the Europeans were going to do more stimulus than they have, given that all they really think about is Weimar inflation, because that was the antecedent to the Third Reich? Who expects them to deliver anything good? <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-so-called-revelations-re-establish-the/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: So-called revelations re-establish the bear </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-so-called-revelations-re-establish-the/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: So-called revelations re-establish the bear </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-so-called-revelations-re-establish-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1502177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-so-called-revelations-re-establish-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>featured</category><category>g-20</category><category>geithner</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>wagoner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM and Ford ready weak pitches for taxpayer bucks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/gm-and-ford-ready-weak-pitches-for-taxpayer-bucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/gm-and-ford-ready-weak-pitches-for-taxpayer-bucks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/gm-and-ford-ready-weak-pitches-for-taxpayer-bucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/autoplant.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) are going in front of Congress today to ask for <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2008/db2008121_568690.htm">$25 billion</a> worth of taxpayer money. (It seems they <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/autos/autobeat/archives/2008/12/messrs_wagoner.html">won't be flying in</a> separate private jets.) GM will announce a reopening of its UAW contract and the winding down of its Hummer, Pontiac, Saab and Saturn brands. Ford will try to sell Volvo to the Swedish government. What's lacking from both plans at this stage is enough detail about cost savings to know whether taxpayers will get their money back. </p>
<p>As I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/">posted</a>, there is a $16 billion (in cost savings) six point restructuring plan which GM could have used, but it chose a different path. The six-point plan involved closing or selling the four brands and their related dealerships. GM's plan proposes to slowly wind down these brands and keep the dealers. It has been trying to sell Saab but no takers have emerged. </p>
<p>Moreover, GM workers remain higher paid than workers of its Japanese competitors. For example, UAW workers make an average of $76 an hour, including the cost of retiree benefits. <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Co.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) workers cost, all in, about $18 an hour less. It is unclear how much GM plans to cut from UAW pay by reopening the contract. Absent more details, today's GM restructuring plan does not provide a clear path to profitability.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/gm-and-ford-ready-weak-pitches-for-taxpayer-bucks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM and Ford ready weak pitches for taxpayer bucks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/gm-and-ford-ready-weak-pitches-for-taxpayer-bucks/">GM and Ford ready weak pitches for taxpayer bucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2008/db2008121_568690.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/gm-and-ford-ready-weak-pitches-for-taxpayer-bucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1388467/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/gm-and-ford-ready-weak-pitches-for-taxpayer-bucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>f</category><category>featured</category><category>ford</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>mulally</category><category>nardelli</category><category>tm</category><category>toyota</category><category>wagoner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors gets an earnings boost]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/26/general-motors-gets-an-earnings-boost/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/26/general-motors-gets-an-earnings-boost/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/26/general-motors-gets-an-earnings-boost/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img width="116" vspace="1" hspace="1" height="116" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/gm_logo.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" /><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/gm-posts-2q-loss-of-32-billion-but-makes/n20060726081509990007">General Motors (GM) reported a net loss of $3.2 billion</a>, or $5.62 per share this morning. This figure included one time charges for writing down announced costs associated with buyouts for almost a third of its factory employees. Excluding charges, GM posted a profit of $2.03 per share which easily topped estimates of $0.55 by analysts polled by Thomson Financial.<br /><br />Total revenues for the second quarter rose to $54.4 billion from $48.5 billion as revenue from auto sales rose 11 percent to $45.2 billion from $40.4 billion. The company stated that global automotive operations, excluding charges, posted their first profit excluding charges since 2004.<br /><br />GM has been enjoying a great year so far, mostly resulting from the massive reduction in it's workforce. But the company realizes that it needs to do more than just cut costs to keep the good times rolling. </p>
<p>"We know we have to develop and build great cars and trucks to grow our business and we're encouraged by the recent success of our newest vehicles, particularly in the U.S. market," GM Chairman and Chief Executive Rick Wagoner said. "Our newly launched vehicles will account for about 30 percent of our U.S. retail sales this year and grow to 40 percent next year."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/26/general-motors-gets-an-earnings-boost/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Motors gets an earnings boost</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/26/general-motors-gets-an-earnings-boost/">General Motors gets an earnings boost</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/gm-posts-operating-profit-net-loss/20060726071009990001?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/26/general-motors-gets-an-earnings-boost/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/647090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/26/general-motors-gets-an-earnings-boost/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charges</category><category>earnings</category><category>GM</category><category>Wagoner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:36:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
