<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Despite Economic Woes, Wall Street Pay Set to Jump]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/dollarsign.jpg"  alt="" />Wall Street employees <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704518104575546542463746562.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews%20">will make a record $144 billion this year</a> -- a 4% increase from 2009. <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported that the compensation figures comprise pay and benefits at "about three dozen of the top publicly held securities and investment-services firms -- which include banks, investment banks, hedge funds, money-management firms and securities exchanges."<br />
<br />
Revenue will rise at 29 of the 35 firms that had their pay plans examined by the paper. But the <em>Journal </em>says that revenue at the firms will not rise as quickly as compensation. Wall Street revenue is expected to improve 3% to $448 billion this year compared to last. Employee payout as a percent of revenue will remain flat at 32.1%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Despite Economic Woes, Wall Street Pay Set to Jump</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/">Despite Economic Woes, Wall Street Pay Set to Jump</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19670335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankers</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>wall street bonuses</category><category>wall street pay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bankers should be rewarded for their success and pay for their mistakes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/bankers-should-be-rewarded-for-their-success-and-pay-for-their-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/bankers-should-be-rewarded-for-their-success-and-pay-for-their-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/bankers-should-be-rewarded-for-their-success-and-pay-for-their-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/opinion/28mon4.html?th&amp;emc=th">New York Times</a></em> agrees with a proposal I've been posting about for months, for example, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/why-bankers-pay-needs-to-change/">here</a>. The <em>Times </em>suggests that "banks should hold a big chunk of bankers' pay in escrow to be paid out over a long period. Compensation could then be made contingent on the long-term success of each banker's strategies." The only way this could actually happen is if all banks agreed to it. And that won't happen unless the government mandates the idea.</p>
<p>This is a timely discussion because <em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/28/AR2008012802561.html?hpid=topnews">The Washington Post</a></em> reports today that bankers are expected to earn bonuses of $33.2 billion for 2007 -- just 2% below 2006's record year -- that despite about $100 billion worth of write-downs due to bad loans and a loss of $200 billion in market value for the seven biggest banks. </p>
<p>Not everyone did well. Bonuses were down by as much as 50% to 60% in subprime-mortgage-related departments, while groups such as investment banking took in bonuses that were on average 10% higher than in 2006.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/bankers-should-be-rewarded-for-their-success-and-pay-for-their-m/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bankers should be rewarded for their success and pay for their mistakes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/bankers-should-be-rewarded-for-their-success-and-pay-for-their-m/">Bankers should be rewarded for their success and pay for their mistakes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/opinion/28mon4.html?th&amp;emc=th>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/bankers-should-be-rewarded-for-their-success-and-pay-for-their-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1100522/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/bankers-should-be-rewarded-for-their-success-and-pay-for-their-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street pay</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetPay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
