<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hsy/" rel="tag">Hershey Co (HSY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyx/" rel="tag">NYSE Euronext (NYX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/nyse.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The future investment stars are already with us. The <a href="http://www.bkfk.com/financialfuture/" target="_blank">NYSE Financial Future Challenge</a>, operated by the <a href="http://www.nysefoundation.org/" target="_blank">NYSE Foundation</a>, <a href="http://www.bkfk.com" target="_blank">By Kids for Kids</a>, <a href="http://www.K12.com" target="_blank">K12 Inc.</a> and the <a href="http://www.uiausa.org" target="_blank">United Investors Association</a>, is in full swing, with five finalists just identified. To reach this level, the participants had to develop a new product, idea or process that would "excite, educate and motivate their peers" to become interested in the financial marketplace. The eventual winner lurks within this subset and will receive a $2,500 prize -- a great way to get that portfolio started. And, he or she will be feted at a closing bell ceremony at the NYSE (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nyse-euronext/nyx/nys" target="_blank">NYX</a>) on January 11, 2010.</p>
<p>The finalists presented a variety of ideas which are sure to generate some buzz. Kelsey Foss, a 12-year-old from Mountainville, NY, proposed a new television show, "Stock Market Tycoon Idol," which would harness the popularity of reality TV while amping up the content. The program would involve the journeys of 10 kids as they seek to make money or lose it, with the possibility of becoming virtual millionaires along the way. The show would be set at a mock NYSE studio on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WallStreet/">Wall Street</a>, and exports would be brought out to mentor the contestants. The reality TV reach would help engage a younger audience.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/">Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235635/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>abercrombie and fitch</category><category>AbercrombieAndFitch</category><category>anf</category><category>apple</category><category>apple inc.</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>apple ipod</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>AppleIpod</category><category>chicago</category><category>chicago illinois</category><category>ChicagoIllinois</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hershey</category><category>hersheys</category><category>hsy</category><category>illinois</category><category>iphone</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>k12</category><category>k12inc.</category><category>lrn</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>nyse</category><category>nyse euronext</category><category>NyseEuronext</category><category>nysegroupnyx</category><category>nyx</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>sapphire energy</category><category>SapphireEnergy</category><category>six flags</category><category>six flags inc.</category><category>SixFlags</category><category>SixFlagsInc.</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>texas</category><category>virginia</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>walt disney</category><category>walt disney co.</category><category>WaltDisney</category><category>WaltDisneyCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: Investors' caution reigns amid earnings season]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bdk/" rel="tag">Black and Decker (BDK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bmy/" rel="tag">Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cb/" rel="tag">Chubb Corp (CB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmg/" rel="tag">Chipotle Mexican Grill'A' (CMG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bg/" rel="tag">Bunge Ltd. (BG)</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Despite largely positive corporate earnings reports, investor caution has set upon Wall Street. For the third straight day stocks are set to move into negative territory, with futures showing the three major U.S. indexes heading lower ahead of Thursday's opening bell.<br /><br />Some blamed Wednesday's near 1% drops in the Dow Jones industrial average and the S&amp;P 500 on a late-day sell-off driven by the latest <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/21/latest-fed-beige-book-survey-shows-the-economy-mending-slowly/">Beige Book survey</a> from the Federal Reserve that showed the economy is ever so slowly emerging from recession -- too slowly, it would seem, for investors.<br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the bell: Investors' caution reigns amid earnings season</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/">Before the bell: Investors' caution reigns amid earnings season</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19205229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>capital one</category><category>CapitalOne</category><category>featured</category><category>investing</category><category>investors</category><category>stock markets</category><category>StockMarkets</category><category>stocks</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: Investors cautious amid earnings bonanza]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/before-the-bell-investors-cautious-amid-earnings-bonanza/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/before-the-bell-investors-cautious-amid-earnings-bonanza/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/before-the-bell-investors-cautious-amid-earnings-bonanza/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Stocks are poised to head lower as investors continue to digest news out Tuesday about the nation's flagging housing market. While in recent months optimism had crept into builder stocks in anticipation of recovery, a report from the Commerce Department showed new-home construction flat last month.<br /><br />The news sent the three major U.S. stock indexes lower in trading yesterday, and futures this morning show the Nasdaq Composite Index and the S&amp;P 500 each lower by a half percent, along with the Dow Jones industrial average, which could be trading back under the 10,000 level.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/before-the-bell-investors-cautious-amid-earnings-bonanza/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the bell: Investors cautious amid earnings bonanza</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/before-the-bell-investors-cautious-amid-earnings-bonanza/">Before the bell: Investors cautious amid earnings bonanza</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/before-the-bell-investors-cautious-amid-earnings-bonanza/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/before-the-bell-investors-cautious-amid-earnings-bonanza/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beige book</category><category>BeigeBook</category><category>crude oil inventories</category><category>CrudeOilInventories</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>in focus</category><category>InFocus</category><category>investors</category><category>opening bell</category><category>OpeningBell</category><category>stocks</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil, the stock market and economic inconsistency]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-the-stock-market-and-economic-inconsistency/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-the-stock-market-and-economic-inconsistency/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-the-stock-market-and-economic-inconsistency/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/wallstreets.jpg" alt="" />There is too much noise on Wall Street, and it becomes clearer with each passing day why some of the best money managers and investors in the world choose to do their business from somewhere else.<br /><br />The most famous of all being '<em>my pal' </em>Warren Buffett who has operated his business from the amazing <em>"financial Mecca"</em> of Omaha, Nebraska.<br /><br />Today I wake up to the news that the market is down because oil is down because the world economy may not be healing as fast as many had hoped.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-the-stock-market-and-economic-inconsistency/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil, the stock market and economic inconsistency</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-the-stock-market-and-economic-inconsistency/">Oil, the stock market and economic inconsistency</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-the-stock-market-and-economic-inconsistency/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19087820/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-the-stock-market-and-economic-inconsistency/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>market direction</category><category>MarketDirection</category><category>Oil</category><category>Oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>waren buffett</category><category>WarenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernard Madoff is a horse thief: Sentencing set for June 29]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/bernard-madoff-is-a-horse-thief-sentencing-set-for-june-29/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/bernard-madoff-is-a-horse-thief-sentencing-set-for-june-29/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/bernard-madoff-is-a-horse-thief-sentencing-set-for-june-29/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/madoff-2.jpg" alt="" />Wednesday, <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/madoff-seeks-leniency-in-sentencing/539335?icid=main|htmlws-main|dl7|link1|http%3A%2F%2Fmoney.aol.com%2Farticle%2Fmadoff-seeks-leniency-in-sentencing%2F539335">Bernard Madoff requested leniency</a> through his attorney Ira Sorkin, who suggested a sentence of 12 years would be a sufficient penalty for his client's crime of stealing billions of dollars in one of the greatest frauds in history.<br /><br />Sentencing by U.S. District Judge Denny Chin is set for Monday June 29, and the eyes of the world will be upon him. So will the eyes of the yet-to-be discovered fraudsters everywhere.<br /><br />My thoughts on the subject are relatively simple and have little to do with revenge or payback. In cases like this I often remember a very old quote from another time and place.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/bernard-madoff-is-a-horse-thief-sentencing-set-for-june-29/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernard Madoff is a horse thief: Sentencing set for June 29</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/bernard-madoff-is-a-horse-thief-sentencing-set-for-june-29/">Bernard Madoff is a horse thief: Sentencing set for June 29</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/bernard-madoff-is-a-horse-thief-sentencing-set-for-june-29/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19077358/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/bernard-madoff-is-a-horse-thief-sentencing-set-for-june-29/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernie madoff</category><category>BernieMadoff</category><category>featured</category><category>fraud</category><category>hedge fund collapse</category><category>hedge fund managers</category><category>HedgeFundCollapse</category><category>HedgeFundManagers</category><category>Judge Denny Chin</category><category>JudgeDennyChin</category><category>Madoff</category><category>Madoff sentencing</category><category>MadoffSentencing</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>white collar crime</category><category>WhiteCollarCrime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the Bell:  Wall Street is on a roll -- for now]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/before-the-bell-wall-street-is-on-a-roll-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/before-the-bell-wall-street-is-on-a-roll-for-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/before-the-bell-wall-street-is-on-a-roll-for-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbby/" rel="tag">Bed Bath and Beyond (BBBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cpki/" rel="tag">Calif Pizza Kitchen (CPKI)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Investors are expecting Wall Street to continue its recent winning ways.</p>
<p>Stocks are poised to open higher as investors await March retail sales data and the weekly unemployment report. Markets in Europe and Asia were higher. </p>
<p>Retail sales, though weak, may not be as bad as investors had feared. According to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123922687480702703.html">Wall Street Journal,</a> <span class="companyRollover link11unvisited">"Wal-Mart Stores</span> and a select group of its discounting peers have helped retail sales exceed modest expectations every month since December, and that streak likely will continue."<br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/before-the-bell-wall-street-is-on-a-roll-for-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the Bell:  Wall Street is on a roll -- for now</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/before-the-bell-wall-street-is-on-a-roll-for-now/">Before the Bell:  Wall Street is on a roll -- for now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123921022970001775.html#mod=testMod>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/before-the-bell-wall-street-is-on-a-roll-for-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1512579/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/before-the-bell-wall-street-is-on-a-roll-for-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBY</category><category>CPKI</category><category>CTX</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>MS</category><category>PHM</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>unemployment</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DailyFinance today: Pay for failure with CEOs losing billions, an innovative way to stimulate the economy, home loan modifications not helping, and protestors arrested at Wall Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/dailyfinance-today-pay-for-failure-with-ceos-losing-billions-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/dailyfinance-today-pay-for-failure-with-ceos-losing-billions-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/dailyfinance-today-pay-for-failure-with-ceos-losing-billions-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/protestors-arrested-at-wall-street-march/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/protesters_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/protestors-arrested-at-wall-street-march/">Protesters arrested at Wall Street rally</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/home-loans-failing-at-a-high-rate-despite-modifications/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/prestamos-hipotecarios-200sl011108_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/home-loans-failing-at-a-high-rate-despite-modifications/">Home loan modifications not doing the job</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/innovative-ways-to-stimulate-the-economy-a-transferable-homebuy/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/blog-stimulate-the-economy-military-housing-150x200_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td> <a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/innovative-ways-to-stimulate-the-economy-a-transferable-homebuy/">Innovative ways to stimulate the economy: A transferable homebuyer's credit</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right">
            <div align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/pay-for-performnce-try-pay-for-failure-ceos-paid-millions-to/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/roundtable200x150_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></div>
            </td>
            <td> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/04/03/pay-for-performnce-try-pay-for-failure-ceos-paid-millions-to/">Pay for performance? Try pay for failure, as CEOs paid millions to lose billions </a></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/dailyfinance-today-pay-for-failure-with-ceos-losing-billions-a/">DailyFinance today: Pay for failure with CEOs losing billions, an innovative way to stimulate the economy, home loan modifications not helping, and protestors arrested at Wall Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/dailyfinance-today-pay-for-failure-with-ceos-losing-billions-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1507715/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/dailyfinance-today-pay-for-failure-with-ceos-losing-billions-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceos</category><category>economy</category><category>home</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Early April Fools joke? $45 million in taxpayer money to retrain investment bankers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/early-april-fools-joke-45-million-in-taxpayer-money-to-retrain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/early-april-fools-joke-45-million-in-taxpayer-money-to-retrain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/early-april-fools-joke-45-million-in-taxpayer-money-to-retrain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstpic.jpg" alt="" />I am not often at a loss for words, but when I found out that New York is going to spend our tax dollars to retrain investment bankers for some kind of useful work, I was speechless. In total, New York will spend <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/nyregion/19bankers.html?hp">$45 million</a> in government money to retrain investment bankers, traders and others who have lost jobs on Wall Street, as well as provide seed capital and office space for new businesses those laid-off bankers might create.</p>
<p>This raises so many questions: Why does an unemployed investment banker need any taxpayer money? Don't retired investment bankers already have tens of millions of dollars stored up? What kind of work could an investment banker be trained to do that someone would pay for? And if so, that other job would pay so much less than investment banking why would a former investment banker would take the job?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/early-april-fools-joke-45-million-in-taxpayer-money-to-retrain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Early April Fools joke? $45 million in taxpayer money to retrain investment bankers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/early-april-fools-joke-45-million-in-taxpayer-money-to-retrain/">Early April Fools joke? $45 million in taxpayer money to retrain investment bankers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/early-april-fools-joke-45-million-in-taxpayer-money-to-retrain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1464695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/early-april-fools-joke-45-million-in-taxpayer-money-to-retrain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>investment bankers</category><category>InvestmentBankers</category><category>retraining</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Today's technical outlook: Wall Street fails Geithner's plan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/todays-technical-outlook-wall-street-fails-geithners-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/todays-technical-outlook-wall-street-fails-geithners-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/todays-technical-outlook-wall-street-fails-geithners-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/sams-chart.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Even though Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner could have made a better impression on Wall Street, the over-reaction to the plan he outlined seems excessive.<br /><br />In just hours after the announcement, the major indices backed away from the key 20- and 50-day moving average lines and plunged to the bottom of the current trading range. For the S&amp;P 500, the support is at 800 to 820 -- and the index closed just seven points above the top line while the Dow actually penetrated its support line.<br /><br />It is hoped that Geithner's professorial lecture resulted from inexperience in explaining real issues to the public following an increase of presidential expectations. If that's the situation, then we should see more details and see them quickly.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/todays-technical-outlook-wall-street-fails-geithners-plan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Today's technical outlook: Wall Street fails Geithner's plan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/todays-technical-outlook-wall-street-fails-geithners-plan/">Today's technical outlook: Wall Street fails Geithner's plan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/todays-technical-outlook-wall-street-fails-geithners-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1456927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/todays-technical-outlook-wall-street-fails-geithners-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chris dodd</category><category>ChrisDodd</category><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>geithner</category><category>mark to market</category><category>MarkToMarket</category><category>sam collins</category><category>SamCollins</category><category>timothy geithner</category><category>TimothyGeithner</category><category>treasury secretary</category><category>TreasurySecretary</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Collins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why you should ignore analysts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/why-you-should-ignore-analysts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/why-you-should-ignore-analysts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/why-you-should-ignore-analysts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/wallstreets.jpg"  alt="" />Remember Wall Street analysts? Those are the people who go on tout TV and tell you to buy stocks regardless of what is happening to stock prices. The reason you should ignore them is that they get paid to make you buy stocks which generates commissions for their employer. If they issue 'sell' recommendations, they will scare people away from the market. And then there won't be any commissions to pay them.</p>
This comes to mind courtesy of some fresh statistics on analysts' rate of issuing buy recommendations as stocks have plummeted in the last year. When stocks hit their peak in 2007, analysts put buy or hold calls on stocks <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/business/09analyst.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print">95%</a> of the time. And last month, history's worst January, analysts urged you to sell a mere 5.9% of stocks. In 2008, as the market lost almost 40%, sells never outweighed buys or holds.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/why-you-should-ignore-analysts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why you should ignore analysts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/why-you-should-ignore-analysts/">Why you should ignore analysts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/why-you-should-ignore-analysts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/why-you-should-ignore-analysts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nyse</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>wall street analysts</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetAnalysts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kucinich calls on Citigroup to drop Mets stadium naming rights]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/kucinich-calls-on-citigroup-to-drop-mets-stadium-naming-rights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/kucinich-calls-on-citigroup-to-drop-mets-stadium-naming-rights/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/kucinich-calls-on-citigroup-to-drop-mets-stadium-naming-rights/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/c-citigroup-logo.jpg"  alt="" />Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Ted Poe sent a letter to new Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner last week asking that he demand that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) withdraw from its 20-year, $400 million contract for the naming rights to the New York Mets stadium.<br /><br />"At Citigroup, 50,000 people will lose their jobs. Yet in the boardroom of Citigroup, spending $400 million to put a name on stadium seems like a good idea," <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-01-30-congress-citigroup_N.htm">said Kucinich</a>. "The Treasury Department, which forced Citigroup corporate executives to give up their private jet, should also demand that Citigroup cancel its $400 million advertisement at the Mets field and instead begin to repay their debt to the taxpayers."<br /><br />If a $400 million naming rights contract from a company that's on government welfare doesn't seem ludicrous to you, it should. The notion that the $20 million per year will generate enough earnings for the company to offset the cost is a pretty silly one.<br /><br />But maybe there's a compromise: Since all of us provided cash to Citigroup, maybe it should be given a name that's a tribute to grotesque mismanagement at the company: "Citigroup's Arrogance Arena" perhaps? Or how about "Failed Bank Field." The possibilities are endless, and definitely something that should be put in an online poll with one vote per taxpayer. If we're going to bail out the banks and still let them buy naming rights to baseball fields, we should at least have some fun with it.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/kucinich-calls-on-citigroup-to-drop-mets-stadium-naming-rights/">Kucinich calls on Citigroup to drop Mets stadium naming rights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-01-30-congress-citigroup_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/kucinich-calls-on-citigroup-to-drop-mets-stadium-naming-rights/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1447230/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/kucinich-calls-on-citigroup-to-drop-mets-stadium-naming-rights/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>inthenews</category><category>naming rights</category><category>NamingRights</category><category>New York Mets</category><category>NewYorkMets</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is there a new reality on Wall Street pay?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img height="160" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/moneyroll.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />One of the questions that I spent this week discussing is this: What was Wall Street thinking? Whether it's using taxpayer money to pay itself <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013003665.html">$18.4 billion</a> in bonuses or to buy a $50 million corporate jet after posting <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/">$35 billion</a> in losses, people are wondering whether Wall Street gets it. The answer is yes. Wall Street gets that nobody stopped it from paying bonuses when it took our money, so it took what it could. Unless we limit how Wall Street spends taxpayer money, it will keep paying itself big bonuses.</p>
<p>Wall Street is a place where the people at the top are trained to grab as much as they can out of the hands of the other graspers. At least $200 billion worth of TARP money went to Wall Street with no strings attached. If you put that much money into the hands of a culture that believes firmly in taking what it can get -- it usually pays half of its revenues to employees -- you end up with Wall Street taking as much as it can from the taxpayers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is there a new reality on Wall Street pay?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/">Is there a new reality on Wall Street pay?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1446417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>corporate jet</category><category>corporate jets</category><category>CorporateJet</category><category>CorporateJets</category><category>tarp</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street bailout</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetBailout</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street has been strip mining America]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-has-been-strip-mining-america/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-has-been-strip-mining-america/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-has-been-strip-mining-america/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" height="160" width="205" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/strip-mining.jpg" alt="" />Just like the government's tardy recognition of the recession, nine months after the fact, Washington has become embarrassed over and over again by the scandalous behavior of Wall Street investment banks and corporate executives. This includes: overindulgent life styles at company, shareholder, and taxpayer expense; outrageous bonuses by money losing companies; corporate jets; lavish business retreats; gaming of stock options and more.<br /><br />Our nation has been strip-mined by corporate executives that think short term, focus on themselves instead of their company, and people they represent, and have been negligent to consider the repercussions of their actions or inaction.<br /><br /> Strip-mining allows for the removal of minerals in the fastest and easiest way possible grabbing at surface material as you work your way down and cause havoc to the ecosystem. Environmental problems are of great concern now more than ever and the process is heavily regulated -- more so than the economic strip mining of the last few years.<br /><br />Since Washington is so affected by lobbyists whose interests are not aligned with the overall public well-being (note: I did not say welfare), as the cynic would say <em>"the best government money can buy"</em>, the public is not getting its monies worth.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-has-been-strip-mining-america/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street has been strip mining America</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-has-been-strip-mining-america/">Wall Street has been strip mining America</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-has-been-strip-mining-america/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-has-been-strip-mining-america/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bail outs</category><category>BailOuts</category><category>featured</category><category>Government regulation</category><category>GovernmentRegulation</category><category>kft</category><category>Mary Shapiro</category><category>MaryShapiro</category><category>MER</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>SEC</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Strip Mining</category><category>StripMining</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>Warren Buffet</category><category>WarrenBuffet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If Morgan Stanley (MS) cuts jobs, stock may rise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) may cut 5% of its workforce. Given the drop-off in investment banking activity and asset management, the number may not be high enough, but it is a start. Wall Street is still worried about the bank's future, as its stock price shows. Shares change hands at $21, down more than 50% during that last year. Morgan is doing better than some other companies in its sector, but the deepening recession could hurt earnings more than last year.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123327814481231565.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription requited), "The New York firm, which let go of about 7,000 employees last year, may decide on another round of staffing cuts in the next two weeks."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If Morgan Stanley (MS) cuts jobs, stock may rise</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/">If Morgan Stanley (MS) cuts jobs, stock may rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123327814481231565.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445390/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>MS</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Memo to the President: Don't recycle bad bank fix ideas, get new ones that work]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/memo-to-the-president-dont-recycle-bad-bank-fix-ideas-get-new/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/memo-to-the-president-dont-recycle-bad-bank-fix-ideas-get-new/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/memo-to-the-president-dont-recycle-bad-bank-fix-ideas-get-new/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/obamageithner.jpg" />You've asked people to give you ideas, so here's one: Don't recycle Bush's failed ideas and expect them to work. Each of those failed ideas has deep flaws. Instead, if you have to save the banking system -- and I would like to see how things would work if companies and people lived within their means rather than borrowing to pay for things that they can't afford -- then <em>cull and capitalize</em> or <em>create new banks</em>.</p>
<p>Here's what's wrong with the three <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/30/news/bailout.what.next.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009013003">recycled Bush ideas</a> being floated:</p>
<ul> </ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/memo-to-the-president-dont-recycle-bad-bank-fix-ideas-get-new/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Memo to the President: Don't recycle bad bank fix ideas, get new ones that work</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/memo-to-the-president-dont-recycle-bad-bank-fix-ideas-get-new/">Memo to the President: Don't recycle bad bank fix ideas, get new ones that work</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/memo-to-the-president-dont-recycle-bad-bank-fix-ideas-get-new/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445475/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/memo-to-the-president-dont-recycle-bad-bank-fix-ideas-get-new/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank stocks</category><category>banking</category><category>banks</category><category>BankStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>financial stocks</category><category>FinancialStocks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>obama</category><category>tarp</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama flips out over Wall Street bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/obama-flips-out-over-wall-street-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/obama-flips-out-over-wall-street-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/obama-flips-out-over-wall-street-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/obamacell.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It takes quite a bit to make our new president angry, but a <em>New York Times</em> report saying that Wall Street paid $18.4 billion in bonuses last year as companies teetered on <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/29/business/29bonus.php">the brink of collapse did the trick. </a><br /><br />Speaking to reporters in Washington, President Obama seemed livid at the financial services industry. He called the payouts "the height of irresponsibility. It is shameful."<br /><br />Wall Street might want to forgo bonuses for everybody. That's Obama's view and it is probably shared by the majority of the American people. Vice President Joe Biden told CNBC that he wants to lock up Wall Street bad guys.<br /><br />Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner already had to twist <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Inc.'s </a>(NYSE<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">:C</a>) arm to "change its mind" about buying a corporate jet. New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/americasMergersNews/idUKN2744918420090127">is investigating bonuses </a>paid by Merrill Lynch before its acquisition by<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"> Bank of America Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>). Then, of course, there are the shenanigans at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>).<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/obama-flips-out-over-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama flips out over Wall Street bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/obama-flips-out-over-wall-street-bonuses/">Obama flips out over Wall Street bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/americasMergersNews/idUKN2744918420090127>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/obama-flips-out-over-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444983/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/obama-flips-out-over-wall-street-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>andrew cuomo</category><category>AndrewCuomo</category><category>bac</category><category>featured</category><category>geithner</category><category>obama</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street bailout</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetBailout</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street loses $35 billion in 2008, uses TARP for $18.4 billion bonus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg"  alt="" />Just when you think you've heard it all, you hear more. In the last year, Wall Street -- or more specifically, the brokerage units of New York financial companies -- lost <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29bonus.html?ref=business">$35 billion</a>. (Worldwide, financial institutions have taken $1 trillion in write-offs of bad assets). Those firms received a large proportion of the $350 billion TARP and persuaded the Treasury to guarantee losses from hundreds of billions worth of their financial toxic waste. Their reward? $18.4 billion in bonuses.</p>
<p>How much of the TARP went to paying for those bonuses? The banks have cleverly neglected to report that. But let's face it -- money is fungible. So if they did not use the money from the deposits they received from the Treasury to pay bonuses, our tax dollars freed up cash they may have had from other sources that did go to paying those $18.4 billion in bonuses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street loses $35 billion in 2008, uses TARP for $18.4 billion bonus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/">Wall Street loses $35 billion in 2008, uses TARP for $18.4 billion bonus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29bonus.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>TARP</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Masters of the universe take a pay cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg"  alt="" />An era of greed that began with the election of Ronald Reagan has come to an abrupt end. That means that the seething emotions of greed and envy that come along with bonus time at investment banks will have fewer dollars attached to them. And talent will flow to government and academia rather than Wall Street. This could be good for the U.S.</p>
<p>Some of those masters of the universe in the investment banking industry have seen the value of their stock tumble (and many of them are going without bonuses this year). Here are some of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/business/27sorkin.html?ref=business">"casualties":</a></p>
<ul />
    <p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Masters of the universe take a pay cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/">Masters of the universe take a pay cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1441849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>b</category><category>BAC</category><category>bailout</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>GS</category><category>john thain</category><category>JohnThain</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>vikram pandit</category><category>VikramPandit</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What's your share of the $4 trillion bailout?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/whats-your-share-of-the-4-trillion-bailout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/whats-your-share-of-the-4-trillion-bailout/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/whats-your-share-of-the-4-trillion-bailout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/wallstreettrader.jpg" />Remember when we were up in arms over the $700 billion taxpayer-funded bailout of the banking industry?<br /><br />Those were the days. With the government now mulling the establishment of an "aggregator bank" to buy all the bad assets of all the banks, former International Monetary Fund chief economist Simon Johnson <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/27/news/bigger.bailout.fortune/">says that</a> the cost of the bailout could be $4 trillion by the time this is done.<br /><br />Four trillion dollars is a lot of lettuce. To help put it in perspective consider this. As of July of 2008, the CIA estimated the US population at 303,824,640. If the total cost of the bailout comes to $4 trillion, that will work out to a bill of $13,165.49 for every man, woman, child and incarcerated felon in America.<br /><br />What does it all mean? I'm not really sure. But given that you (more precisely, your great-great-great-great grandchildren) are cutting a check for more than $13,000 to the financial industry, don't you think that we are perhaps entitled to a higher level of customer service? Could they upgrade the quality of the lollipops, perhaps?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/whats-your-share-of-the-4-trillion-bailout/">What's your share of the $4 trillion bailout?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/27/news/bigger.bailout.fortune/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/whats-your-share-of-the-4-trillion-bailout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1441804/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/whats-your-share-of-the-4-trillion-bailout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailout</category><category>bernanke</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>geithner</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nyse</category><category>obama</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>the fed</category><category>TheFed</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analysts do not have a clue about the quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/analysts-do-not-have-a-clue-about-the-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/analysts-do-not-have-a-clue-about-the-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/analysts-do-not-have-a-clue-about-the-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/wallstreettrader.jpg" alt="" />Wall Street analysts seemed to have thrown up their hands when it comes to fourth quarter earnings. Given the current economic environment, who can blame them?<br /><br />Earnings estimates are almost useless. They have ranges big enough to drive a truck through. No, make that a train. I mean a tank. Imagine a large mode of transportation and you get the idea. My colleague <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2009/01/chaos-theory-ta.html">Douglas McIyntyre </a>recently argued "that has changed so much in the last two quarters that predictions have become hard to make and going into this earnings season the job may become impossible."<br /><br />Take <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co. </a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>). The conglomerate, which has been in Wall Street's dog house forever, is expected to post earnings of 52 cents for the fourth quarter. Or, the parent company of NBC might earn 36 cents. Everyone is sure that<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"> Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) is a basket case but exactly how screwed up the company is a matter of debate. Analysts are forecasting a losses of 47 cents to $1.14 per share. <br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"><br />Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) could earn anywhere from 18 cents and 33 cents. Analysts' estimates for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) range from a profit of 25 cent to a loss of 20 cents. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE)</a>, which<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/14/business/14pfizer.php"> recently announced it would fire 800 scientists</a>, may earn anywhere between 55 cents and 63 cents.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/analysts-do-not-have-a-clue-about-the-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Analysts do not have a clue about the quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/analysts-do-not-have-a-clue-about-the-quarter/">Analysts do not have a clue about the quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/analysts-do-not-have-a-clue-about-the-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1428230/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/analysts-do-not-have-a-clue-about-the-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>corporate earnings</category><category>CorporateEarnings</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>ge</category><category>JPM</category><category>PFE</category><category>TWX</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street analysts</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetAnalysts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:46:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
