<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why is oil at $130?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-is-oil-at-130/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-is-oil-at-130/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-is-oil-at-130/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><em> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/soldier-iraq-oil.jpg" /></em>With oil prices at <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hwVvzcYRMejZJkBUMBSYF3thXkfQ">$130 a barrel</a>,<em> </em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24996843/"><em>The Washington Post</em></a> has finally picked up the story about how a regulatory loophole allows hedge funds and other institutional investors to control unlimited quantities of oil contracts. Over the last few weeks, I've posted about this topic <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/oil-at-130-partly-due-to-goldman-sachs-betting-on-200-oil/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/oil-supply-to-grow-more-than-demand-so-why-is-gas-at-a-record-hi/">here</a>. Nobody seems to know how much of the oil trading these speculators control, but I came across one source that put the figure at <a href="http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3252.shtml">60%</a>.</p>
<p>The so-called swaps loophole is promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) which has exempted investment banks from rules that limit speculative buying, a prerogative traditionally reserved for airlines and trucking companies that need to lock in future fuel costs. The CFTC also waived regulations limiting trading in overseas markets.</p>
<p>The CFTC is complaining that it needs more resources. It claims that commodities trading has exploded in complexity and popularity growing six-fold in trading volume since 2000. But the CFTC's staff has dropped to its lowest levels in its 33-year history. According to CFTC acting Chairman Walter Lukken, "We could hire an extra 100 people and put them to work tomorrow given the inflow of trading volume." <br /></p>
<p>I think the CFTC should close the loophole and get the people it needs to do its job. If the speculators can't find a way around the closed loophole, their share of oil trading volume will drop. Then we'll see what happens to the price of oil. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-is-oil-at-130/">Why is oil at $130?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24996843/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-is-oil-at-130/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1217650/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-is-oil-at-130/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cftc</category><category>featured</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>swaps loophole</category><category>SwapsLoophole</category><category>walter lukken</category><category>WalterLukken</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
