<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! Earnings: Q3 Wasn't Very Exciting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/20/yahoo-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/20/yahoo-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/20/yahoo-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="yahoo earnings" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/yahoo-logo.jpg" />Yahoo (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) released third-quarter numbers after the bell on Tuesday, and they didn't do anything for the stock. Shares closed the regular session down 2.7% to $15.49. During the extended-hours period, I saw a quote go by of $15.53. That's right, the equity gained a measly four cents. Traders most certainly weren't applauding that performance.<br />
<p>
Very recently, I wrote a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/yahoo-worth-a-look/">bearish piece</a> on the web portal. Since then, the stock has risen. Also, the company has been surrounded by some interesting speculation as of late regarding a potential <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/credit/yahoo-hired-goldman-sachs-to-deal-with-takeover-bids/19673693/">takeover</a>, with one theoretical scenario involving the owner of BloggingStocks, Aol (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aol-inc-aol-inc-common-stock/aol/nys">AOL</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/20/yahoo-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! Earnings: Q3 Wasn't Very Exciting</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/20/yahoo-earnings/">Yahoo! Earnings: Q3 Wasn't Very Exciting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/yahoo-beats-earnings-but-misses-revenues-again/19680771/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/20/yahoo-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19680848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/20/yahoo-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>carol bartz</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>web portal</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yahoo earnings</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! not for me after Q2 report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/yahoo-260a071806.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) second-quarter <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/yahoo-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid234095819?channel=pf">earnings release</a>, which was issued after the bell on Tuesday, didn't go over so well. Sales declined 13%. Adjusted earnings were 16 cents per share. That means that there was zero per-share profit growth on the bottom line. To add insult to injury, adjusted operating cash flow declined 10%. </p>
<p>In terms of expectations, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN2126754220090721">Reuters</a> is reporting a beat of two pennies based on Yahoo!'s reported income of 10 cents per share. No one really cared. The stock sold off in yesterday's after-hours session, losing over 3% of its value. This was on top of losing 1.5% during the regular trading session. A lot of shares were traded yesterday, too. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! not for me after Q2 report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/">Yahoo! not for me after Q2 report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/yahoo-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid234095819?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN2126754220090721>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19105872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>online</category><category>search</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>web portal</category><category>WebPortal</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TWX to let AOL run free -- good idea!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/twx-to-let-aol-run-free-good-idea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/twx-to-let-aol-run-free-good-idea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/twx-to-let-aol-run-free-good-idea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/aol-logo.jpg" />Last week it was announced that the long-anticipated <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/aol-spin-off-approved-huge-re-org-coming-2009-5">separation of AOL</a> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) is set to happen before the end of the year --<em> then what?</em></p>
<p>If all goes well, AOL will set its own course sustaining what's left of its internet prominence, after falling from what was once internet dominance before its merger with TWX, and the continuous contraction of its dial-up subscriptions.<br /></p>
<p>AOL still attracts more than 100 million Internet users to its online content portal, which includes BloggingStocks, so the adventure will continue. And, an <em>AD-venture</em> it is sure to be.</p>
<p>The same is true for Time Warner, the world's largest media conglomerate with operations spanning film, television, cable TV, and publishing. It will have an <em>AD-venture</em> of its own.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/twx-to-let-aol-run-free-good-idea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>TWX to let AOL run free -- good idea!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/twx-to-let-aol-run-free-good-idea/">TWX to let AOL run free -- good idea!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/twx-to-let-aol-run-free-good-idea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19053902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/twx-to-let-aol-run-free-good-idea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>bloggingstocks</category><category>entertainment</category><category>Fanhouse</category><category>featured</category><category>internet</category><category>multimedia</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Wallet Pop</category><category>WalletPop</category><category>web portal</category><category>WebPortal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Can Yahoo! impress Wall Street (and maybe Microsoft)?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/earnings-preview-can-yahoo-impress-wall-street-and-maybe-micr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/earnings-preview-can-yahoo-impress-wall-street-and-maybe-micr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/earnings-preview-can-yahoo-impress-wall-street-and-maybe-micr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img height="178" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/yahoo-260a071806.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) will be reporting earnings for the third quarter on Tuesday, October 21. The internet portal hasn't had a great year so far. According to data at <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=yhoo">Earnings.com</a>, the company hasn't seen too much in the way of bottom-line growth. And the stock is, as of this writing, at the low end of its 52-week range. Of course, just about all stocks are having a rough time this year. Then again, Yahoo! could have avoided all this misery and just allowed itself to become assimilated into the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) culture. Poor CEO Jerry Yang. What was he thinking?</p>
<p>The call is for Yahoo! to post at least $0.09 per share for the bottom line. It would be nice if management could go beyond those expectations, since the company posted $0.11 per share in the year-ago period. Yahoo! really needs to show the market that it can stay relevant and keep up with the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) AOL. Google recently <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/17/google-beats-expectations-and-brings-in-the-cash-but-ill-pass/">booked a quarter</a> that went well beyond the thinking of analysts. Yahoo! has a relatively decent history of beating earnings expectations, but it did miss the call last quarter, according to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">AOL Finance</a>. So there's going to be a lot of pressure on Yang to perform. </p>
<p>Of course, let's be honest. The earnings, in the big picture, don't really matter. Yahoo! is essentially, in the minds of many, still an arbitrage play. In fact, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/microsoft-thinking-about-yahoo-once-again/">Tobias Buckell</a> recently commented on this subject. There are a lot of investors out there who would like to see Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer come back to the table to begin a new round of negotiations for a takeover of the portal. I, for one, wouldn't want to see that. Does Microsoft really need the headache of integrating the web company's brand assets with its own? No. However, looking at it from the perspective of a Yahoo! shareholder, I obviously see why a buyout would be attractive. That might be the only way for the stock to command any premium these days.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/earnings-preview-can-yahoo-impress-wall-street-and-maybe-micr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Can Yahoo! impress Wall Street (and maybe Microsoft)?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/earnings-preview-can-yahoo-impress-wall-street-and-maybe-micr/">Earnings preview: Can Yahoo! impress Wall Street (and maybe Microsoft)?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/earnings-preview-can-yahoo-impress-wall-street-and-maybe-micr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1345820/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/earnings-preview-can-yahoo-impress-wall-street-and-maybe-micr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>tobias buckell</category><category>web portal</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
