<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Economy Adds Only 36,000 Jobs in January]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/dol-logo-1270224022.jpg"  alt="Department of Labor" />The jobs number is disappointing at best. Only 36,000 jobs were added in January, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704709304576123862334939594.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. Dow Jones news wires had forecast an increase of 136,000. The unemployment rate fell to 9%.</p>
<p>The key reason for such a poor showing was bad weather. However, the December number was increased to 121,000 jobs, from 103,000.</p>
<p>Commenting on the jobs situation, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said: "Until we see a sustained period of stronger job creation, we cannot consider the recovery to be truly established."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economy Adds Only 36,000 Jobs in January</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/">Economy Adds Only 36,000 Jobs in January</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19829066/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hourly earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>public sector</category><category>unemployment private sector</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>workweek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does a shorter workweek beat unemployment?  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3552/3320623280_75b5be54a2_m.jpg" target="_blank"><img hspace="4" height="179" border="1" align="right" width="220" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/pink-slip.jpg" alt="New store pink slip - opening soon" /></a>As the unemployment rate continues to creep toward the 10% threshold, some companies are exploring more creative ways to cut down on labor costs without handing out pink slips. <br /><br />Case in point, as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/jobs/01workweek.html?_r=1" target="_blank">reviewed </a>by <em>The New York Times</em>: the Vera Institute of Justice, which has reduced some employees' workweeks to 24 hours (or three days out of five). In this example, workers take a 40% reduction in salary as well, but no loss in benefits. Other companies require 32 hours of work in order to retain health care and other benefits.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does a shorter workweek beat unemployment?  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/">Does a shorter workweek beat unemployment?  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/jobs/01workweek.html?_r=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1475717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benefits</category><category>employees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><category>workweek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
