<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: AAPL, EBAY, GE, GOOG, MSFT, TWX, WMT, YHOO -- one more look]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/serious-money-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-twx-wmt-yhoo-one/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/serious-money-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-twx-wmt-yhoo-one/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/serious-money-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-twx-wmt-yhoo-one/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/yahoo_headquarters_victor_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It was June 7, 2006 when I set up a tracking portfolio for our great eight stocks. AOL Money &amp; Finance started BloggingStocks with a focus on these companies based on investor interest. Today, they still stimulate a lot of interest, and comments.</p>
<p>The following share prices are from the original tracking date now updated to last Friday's close, April 11, 2008. Earnings season is upon us again. The Iraq war is still in the headlines, as are the presidential elections, energy prices, recession fears and our latest calamity -- the shameful Washington/Wall Street axis of financial evil. Here are the BloggingStocks eight:</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">AAPL</a>) was $60.00 and is <strong>up</strong> to $<span id="qValue"><span class="price">147.14</span> gaining 145%.</span></p>
<p><span></span><span class="lgRB"><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) was $32.00 and is <strong>down</strong> to $30.87 losing 3.35%.
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) was $34.50 and is <strong>down</strong> to $32.05 losing 7.1%.</p>
<p><a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) was $380.00 and is <strong>up</strong> to $<span id="qValue"><span class="price">457.45</span> gaining 20.38%.</span></p>
<p><span></span><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) was $22.50 and is <strong>up</strong> to $28.28 gaining 25.69%.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) was $17.50 and is <strong>down</strong> to $14.27 losing 18.46%.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys/fundamentals?tabs=fundamentals">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys/fundamentals?tabs=fundamentals">WMT</a>) was $47.00 and is <strong>up</strong> to $54.80 gaining 16.6%.</p>
</span></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) was $31.00 and is <strong>down</strong> to $28.34 losing 8.58%.</p>
<p>So after 22 months we find four stocks are up and four stocks are down. Apple is the clear winner and remains the company to watch going forward. New trend-setting products are introduced regularly and few companies can match its inventiveness or marketing genius. Steve Jobs has hit a grand slam. Microsoft, the perennial cash generating machine, came in second with very strong results given the current state of the economy.</p>
<p>Among the surprises and the one I have taken the most flack for is that Google has not done very well in my eyes. It has been highly volatile and makes for a good trading stock, but if you add the dividend of 3.48% to Wal-Marts appreciation you have about the same growth with one tenth the downside risk.</p>
<p>eBay and GE are remarkable for having achieved nothing over our review period, and although they are down now I consider them break-even investments because they have been trading a few bucks higher and a few lower the entire period. Lots of promise, little results.</p>
<p>Lastly, Time Warner and Yahoo! are big disappointments. Time Warner (owner of BloggingStocks) has a new CEO and change is in the air. Yahoo! is in Microsoft's cross-hairs and looks like it will be something else in a few months. Ironically the two companies are in the midst of discussions to find a way to help each other out of their stagnation. I hope they succeed. Both have great franchises that are struggling to gain traction. Both must contend with Google and Microsoft.</p>
<p>Going forward Apple may be the best bet and Microsoft will probably continue to mint money. The others may just tread water for a while.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. <span class="symbol"><em>He writes the columns </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/"><em>Chasing Value</em></a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/"><em>Serious Money</em></a><em>.</em> Disclosure: I own shares of EBAY, and TWX.</span></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/serious-money-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-twx-wmt-yhoo-one/">Serious Money: AAPL, EBAY, GE, GOOG, MSFT, TWX, WMT, YHOO -- one more look</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/serious-money-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-twx-wmt-yhoo-one/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1130399/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/serious-money-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-twx-wmt-yhoo-one/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc</category><category>AppleInc</category><category>EBAY</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Merger that created Citigroup was a mistake, one of deal's architects says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Luqman Arnold, the former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-new/ubs/nys">UBS AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-new/ubs/nys">UBS</a>) president forced out in 2001, wants the firm to split its investment bank from the private client bank, and look at selling the investment bank and asset management business, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120725574276087561.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal's</em></a> "Heard on the Street".</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) bid to acquire <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) has not gained any steam even though executives of the two companies met this week, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120728254600289107.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/adb7e4a6-019d-11dd-a323-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that the landmark merger that created <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Incorporated</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) was a "mistake" that failed to benefit the financial services giant's investors, customers and employees, said John Reed, who masterminded the $166B deal with Sandy Weill in 1998. Reed, the former head of Citicorp, has advised Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit at least to consider spin-offs, sources said.</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEB SITES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) is branching out by acquiring two companies that provide health-care services, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_15/c4079insidewal917146.htm?chan=search"><em>BusinessWeek</em></a> reported, following in its competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark Corporation's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) shoes. Some investors are wary of Walgreen's move, but Mark Wiltamuth of Morgan Stanley sees it as a new growth avenue and as a push into services complementary to drugstores.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/">Newspaper wrap-up: Merger that created Citigroup was a mistake, one of deal's architects says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1158448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>Citicorp</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc. (c)</category><category>CitigroupInc.(c)</category><category>cvs</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>cvscaremark</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>UBS</category><category>UBS AG</category><category>UbsAg</category><category>vikram pandit</category><category>VikramPandit</category><category>WAG</category><category>walgreen</category><category>walgreens</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Microsoft will wait out Yahoo, and not raise its offer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/newspaper-wrap-up-microsoft-will-wait-out-yahoo-and-not-raise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/newspaper-wrap-up-microsoft-will-wait-out-yahoo-and-not-raise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/newspaper-wrap-up-microsoft-will-wait-out-yahoo-and-not-raise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>If <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) accepts a buyout offer from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), it will have to be at the software maker's original offer of $44.6B. Microsoft won't raise the price, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120701820580579519.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported, and the state of the economy might work in their favor.</li>
    <li>The FAA said that landing gear made by Illinois-based <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aar-corporation/air/nys">AAR Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aar-corporation/air/nys">AIR</a>), and used on hundreds of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>)-built aircraft, includes "unapproved" parts, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120701809607179505.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> also reported.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>) is thinking of not allowing its two British subprime mortgage units to provide any new loans. The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b5b76d94-ff85-11dc-b556-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that the company may also order the units to put additional pressure on borrowers with a spotty credit history whose mortgages are coming to the end of fixed-rate terms.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to the <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080401/AUTO01/804010351/1148"><em>Detroit News</em></a>, people familiar with the matter said that the strike at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-axle-and-manufacturing-holdings-inc/axl/nys">American Axle &amp; Manufacturing Holdings Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-axle-and-manufacturing-holdings-inc/axl/nys">AXL</a>) could threaten production of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) Chevrolet Malibu sedan.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/newspaper-wrap-up-microsoft-will-wait-out-yahoo-and-not-raise/">Newspaper wrap-up: Microsoft will wait out Yahoo, and not raise its offer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/newspaper-wrap-up-microsoft-will-wait-out-yahoo-and-not-raise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1154475/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/newspaper-wrap-up-microsoft-will-wait-out-yahoo-and-not-raise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAR Corp</category><category>AarCorp</category><category>AIR</category><category>American Axle</category><category>American Axle strike</category><category>AmericanAxle</category><category>AmericanAxleStrike</category><category>AXL</category><category>BA</category><category>Boeing</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>LEH</category><category>lehman</category><category>lehman bros</category><category>lehman bros.</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBros</category><category>LehmanBros.</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>Yahoo Inc</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YahooInc</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Lewis, Cayne reportedly seek new bidder for Bear]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/newspaper-wrap-up-lewis-cayne-reportedly-seek-new-bidder-for-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/newspaper-wrap-up-lewis-cayne-reportedly-seek-new-bidder-for-b/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/newspaper-wrap-up-lewis-cayne-reportedly-seek-new-bidder-for-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Jarrett Lilien, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E-Trade Financial Corporation's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) president and COO, who lost out on the CEO job last month to Donald Layton, is going to resign from the online brokerage firm, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120589707378247793.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported; Layton doesn't plan to fill the position.</li>
    <li>Chinese Internet search firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas">Baidu.com Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a>) is poised for aggressive growth but must also confront a number of obstacles, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120577567261342301.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace"><em>Wall Street Journal's</em></a> "Heard in Asia," including a number of lawsuits regarding its music services and a vacancy in the CFO position.</li>
    <li>Alibaba Group, a Chinese Internet company , is in advanced talks with investors to finance its acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) stake to expand its management independence, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120587477187246351.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to inside sources, the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/03192008/business/bear_hunting_102536.htm"><em>New York Post</em></a> reported that billionaire Joseph Lewis and former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns Companies Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) CEO Jimmy Cayne are looking for a white knight that could surpass <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) takeover offer for Bear Lewis and Cayne have reportedly reached out to several private equity firms and overseas banks, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">Barclays Plc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">BCS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/credit-suisse-group/cs/nys">Credit Suisse Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/credit-suisse-group/cs/nys">CS</a>).</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEB SITES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Medical supplies boss Michael Mastromarino, accused of stealing the body parts of around 1,000 corpses, has pleaded guilty to several charges in a deal with prosecutors. The <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7303394.stm"><em>BBC News</em></a> reported that the Biomedical Tissue Services company shipped bones, skin and tendons to tissue-processing companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lifecell-corporation/lifc/nas">LifeCell Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lifecell-corporation/lifc/nas">LIFC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tutogen-medical-inc/ttg/ase">Tutogen Medical Inc</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tutogen-medical-inc/ttg/ase">TTG</a>), which are in turn facing hundreds of civil lawsuits.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/newspaper-wrap-up-lewis-cayne-reportedly-seek-new-bidder-for-b/">Newspaper wrap-up: Lewis, Cayne reportedly seek new bidder for Bear</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/newspaper-wrap-up-lewis-cayne-reportedly-seek-new-bidder-for-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143823/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/newspaper-wrap-up-lewis-cayne-reportedly-seek-new-bidder-for-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alibaba Group</category><category>AlibabaGroup</category><category>baidu</category><category>baidu.com</category><category>Barclays</category><category>BCS</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BIDU</category><category>BSC</category><category>Credit Suisse</category><category>CreditSuisse</category><category>CS</category><category>E-Trade</category><category>E-Trade Financial</category><category>E-tradeFinancial</category><category>ETFC</category><category>JP Morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>LIFC</category><category>LifeCell</category><category>TTG</category><category>Tutogen Medical</category><category>TutogenMedical</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Dow up 420 points thanks to the Fed, brokers back in action]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/closing-bell-christmas-in-march-led-by-fed-and-by-brokers-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/closing-bell-christmas-in-march-led-by-fed-and-by-brokers-fo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/closing-bell-christmas-in-march-led-by-fed-and-by-brokers-fo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p>You can call on numerous issues for today's big market rally. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) led the brokerage firms higher after <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/03/goldman-sachs-2.html">beating earnings expectations</a>, and that may have been equally as important to traders as today's <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/03/fomc-goes-three.html">three-quarters of the way</a> interest rate cut when it took Fed Funds down to 2.25%. Many traders were looking for a full 1% rate cut on the Fed Funds and Discount Rate. The Fed even delivered a cut after seeing a <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/03/high-ppi-more-h.html">strong PPI</a> number that was much more realistic than the CPI number of last week.<br />
<ul>
    <li>DJIA         12,392.66 (+420.41; +3.51%)</li>
    <li>S&amp;P500      1,330.74 (+54.14; +4.24%)</li>
    <li>NASDAQ      2,268.26 (+91.25; +4.19%)</li>
    <li>10YR-TBond  3.451%  (+0.137%)</li>
</ul>
The <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/03/the-52-week--10.html">list of 52-week lows</a> is far smaller on a giant rally like this, but as usual there are always some feature stocks that can't manage to rally. There were some others noted this morning that just <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/03/early-recovery.html">failed to participate</a>, mostly from analyst downgrades.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/closing-bell-christmas-in-march-led-by-fed-and-by-brokers-fo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Dow up 420 points thanks to the Fed, brokers back in action</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/closing-bell-christmas-in-march-led-by-fed-and-by-brokers-fo/">Closing Bell: Dow up 420 points thanks to the Fed, brokers back in action</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/closing-bell-christmas-in-march-led-by-fed-and-by-brokers-fo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/closing-bell-christmas-in-march-led-by-fed-and-by-brokers-fo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>GameStop</category><category>GME</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>LEH</category><category>Lehman</category><category>MA</category><category>MasterCard</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>SRZ</category><category>Sunrise</category><category>Visa</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! still wants more money from Mr. Softy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/yahoo-still-wants-more-money-from-mr-softy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/yahoo-still-wants-more-money-from-mr-softy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/yahoo-still-wants-more-money-from-mr-softy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) believes it is worth more money than what <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is currently willing to pay for it. That isn't a surprising fact. According to the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/18/technology/moritz_yahoo.fortune/index.htm?eref=aol">following article</a>, Yahoo! is confident that it will be doing pretty well over the next couple years, and that Microsoft shouldn't have a problem with paying somewhere around $40 per share, a price which is significantly higher than Mr. Softy's original bid of $31 per share.</p>
<p>There's a lot of speculation as to what will happen. Many observers believe that Microsoft will stand tough and get its price (I'm in that camp at this time). Even though Yahoo! has released some data that suggests that it will be doing well enough in terms of revenues and cash flow to justify the $40-per-share price, I personally wish Microsoft would just forget the whole thing. <br /></p>
<p>Yes, Yahoo! is a huge brand and a major force on the web, and yes, I guess this would help Microsoft against <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and such. But I just don't buy the thesis that Microsoft, no matter what, <em>absolutely needs </em>Yahoo! to grow its business. I think the software giant could easily invest in its own internet properties to further enhance its value in this area. Plus, the Internet is changing so fast all the time, who's to say that Yahoo! will be the right investment for Microsoft? Would that takeover capital be better off invested elsewhere, such as in the Xbox division, which is really doing well right now? Would a higher dividend be in order?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/yahoo-still-wants-more-money-from-mr-softy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! still wants more money from Mr. Softy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/yahoo-still-wants-more-money-from-mr-softy/">Yahoo! still wants more money from Mr. Softy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/18/technology/moritz_yahoo.fortune/index.htm?eref=aol>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/yahoo-still-wants-more-money-from-mr-softy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/yahoo-still-wants-more-money-from-mr-softy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Mr. Softy</category><category>Mr.Softy</category><category>MSFT</category><category>takeover speculation</category><category>TakeoverSpeculation</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! looks at a more semantic web]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/yahoo-looks-at-a-more-semantic-web/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/yahoo-looks-at-a-more-semantic-web/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/yahoo-looks-at-a-more-semantic-web/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/yhoo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"> </a>While <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is cozying up to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) in preparation for the software company acquiring the internet visionary, Yahoo! still wants to be somewhat innovative. In that vein, Yahoo! has said that it wants to incorporate pieces of the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_web">semantic web</a>" into its search index. You know, the one that comes a long second place to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google's</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>)search engine -- but one that is still used heavily all over the world.<br /><br />The semantic web is like a second version of the "world wide web" that looks for the actual meaning of data on a given website instead of just topic relevance to a search like it stands today. The semantic web draws many more variables between web content to really produce valuable feedback to web searchers. Web indexers would need to determine "meaning" of website content instead of just "relevance."<br /><br />Would this make any difference to Yahoo!?Even if the company's search engine were to <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2008/03/17/yahoo-to-change-the-way-it-index%E2%80%99s-sites/">give back more meaningful search results</a> (instead of the most topical), trying to get this concept across to the average web surfer would be extremely difficult. This would not be a competitive advantage against Google (that battle has already been fought), but would give Yahoo! a different search product in a manner of speaking. That is, unless Google begins offering "semantic web" search results as well.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/yahoo-looks-at-a-more-semantic-web/">Yahoo! looks at a more semantic web</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2008/03/17/yahoo-to-change-the-way-it-index%E2%80%99s-sites/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/yahoo-looks-at-a-more-semantic-web/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1141591/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/yahoo-looks-at-a-more-semantic-web/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Semantic web</category><category>SemanticWeb</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's YouTube posts big numbers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/googles-youtube-posts-big-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/googles-youtube-posts-big-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/googles-youtube-posts-big-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Google</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">GOOG</a>) YouTube continues to gain visitors. It competitors have to be dismayed. Why bother posting video content at all when YouTube owns the market.</p>
<p>According to comScore, <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2111Please">YouTube had a 34.3% share of all videos watched</a> in the U.S. during January, an improvement of 1.7 share points over the previous month. </p>
<p>The competition barely registered. AOL, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) had embarrassing share figures, none posting a figure better than 3.2%.</p>
<p>Visitors to Google video sites spent an average of almost 110 minutes per viewer. No other large internet site was above 33 minutes.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/googles-youtube-posts-big-numbers/">Google's YouTube posts big numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/googles-youtube-posts-big-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1140868/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/googles-youtube-posts-big-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>comScore</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google video</category><category>inthenews</category><category>online video</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A deal for Time Warner's AOL may be elusive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/a-deal-for-time-warners-aol-may-be-elusive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/a-deal-for-time-warners-aol-may-be-elusive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/a-deal-for-time-warners-aol-may-be-elusive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p>It is no secret that AOL has been under the microscope of Wall Street, Main Street, and even Silicon Valley. There has been growing talk that a deal could be in the air, and talk may ultimately lead to reality. <em>The New York Times </em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/technology/12aol.html?_r=1&amp;ex=1363060800&amp;en=a95fb3820090abd7&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin">notes</a> that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CEO Jeff Bewkes may be open to a deal or "whatever configuration makes it the strongest and the most valuable."
<p>AOL's primary strategy is to expand its advertising on Platform A, which is a combination of advertising and technology companies that AOL has purchased over the years. Executives see the expansion of their advertising network as the only way to compete and have discussed spinning off the dial-up portion of the business. </p>
<p>Two years ago, Time Warner discussed a merger with AOL and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) for its online operation and has recently explored a potential deal of some sort with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>). Keep in mind, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) owns a 5% stake in AOL, so the world can still change rapidly. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/a-deal-for-time-warners-aol-may-be-elusive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A deal for Time Warner's AOL may be elusive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/a-deal-for-time-warners-aol-may-be-elusive/">A deal for Time Warner's AOL may be elusive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/technology/12aol.html?_r=1&amp;ex=1363060800&amp;en=a95fb3820090abd7&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/a-deal-for-time-warners-aol-may-be-elusive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1138312/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/a-deal-for-time-warners-aol-may-be-elusive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Ask</category><category>Ask Jeeves</category><category>Bewkes</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IACI</category><category>MSFT</category><category>TWX</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Yahoo!'s talks with Time Warner intensify]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-s-talks-with-time-warner-intensify/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-s-talks-with-time-warner-intensify/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-s-talks-with-time-warner-intensify/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJ</strong><strong>OR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to people familiar with the matter, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) has stepped up talks with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) to possibly create an alternative to the unsolicited bid <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) made for Yahoo!, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120468830515212763.html?mod=yahoo_hs&amp;ru=yahoo"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported. Though a Microsoft acquisition of Yahoo! is considered the "most likely outcome," Yahoo! and Time Warner have been in talks to incorporate the AOL Internet unit into Yahoo!</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/47cb8c8c-ea24-11dc-b3c9-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that the European Commission is probing the process under which an important Microsoft document format could be adopted as an industry standard, according to The Financial Times. This move would carry substantial commercial benefits for the company.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/faf8269c-ea21-11dc-b3c9-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1"><em>Financial Times</em></a> also reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) will start selling wine in the U.S. in an effort to enlarge its expanding non-perishable groceries business.</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEB SITES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to the chairman of parent group CITIC Group, Kong Dan, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSPEK24975520080305"><em>Reuters</em></a> reported that CITIC Securities is in talks to acquire a larger stake in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">The Bear Stearns Companies</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) in order to reflect the drop in shares of the broker.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-s-talks-with-time-warner-intensify/">Newspaper wrap-up: Yahoo!'s talks with Time Warner intensify</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-s-talks-with-time-warner-intensify/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1131879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-s-talks-with-time-warner-intensify/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>CItic Group</category><category>Citic Securities</category><category>CiticGroup</category><category>CiticSecurities</category><category>European Commission</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Probe</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Entrepreneur's Journal: Taking LinkedIn to the next level]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/entrepreneurs-journal-taking-linkedin-to-the-next-level/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/entrepreneurs-journal-taking-linkedin-to-the-next-level/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/entrepreneurs-journal-taking-linkedin-to-the-next-level/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/linkedinlogo.gif" /><a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> has become a great tool to help improve your business. For example, Brant Bukowsky, the founder of LakeRentals.com, used the online service to locate a prospect for a management buyout. Or take MyBlogLog. The company found its CEO with LinkedIn and a year later, the company sold to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>);</p>
<p>So, how can you use LinkedIn for your business?</p>
<p>Well, I recently had a chance to meet up with Allen Blue, the Vice President of Product Strategy of LinkedIn and the company's co-founder.</p>
<p>In fact, he provided a framework on how to use LinkedIn. Let's take a look:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/entrepreneurs-journal-taking-linkedin-to-the-next-level/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entrepreneur's Journal: Taking LinkedIn to the next level</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/entrepreneurs-journal-taking-linkedin-to-the-next-level/">Entrepreneur's Journal: Taking LinkedIn to the next level</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/entrepreneurs-journal-taking-linkedin-to-the-next-level/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1127368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/entrepreneurs-journal-taking-linkedin-to-the-next-level/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>LinkedIn</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! to Microsoft: your bid is distracting our workforce]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/yahoo-to-microsoft-your-bid-is-distracting-our-workforce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/yahoo-to-microsoft-your-bid-is-distracting-our-workforce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/yahoo-to-microsoft-your-bid-is-distracting-our-workforce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/yahoo-logo-735610.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) sure does seem to have a big head on its shoulders these days. After <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) stated its intention to by Yahoo! almost a month ago, the shots started flying. At first, Yahoo! seemed to be considering the bid. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) started crying foul, claiming that this combination would <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/googles-brin-speaks-out-about-a-combined-micro-hoo/">limit internet innovation</a>.<br /><br />Yahoo! then rebuffed the offer from Microsoft, stating that the $44 billion offer was too low. For a company that's ran a decent business in the last few years -- but has been sideswiped by Google in every possible way -- what did Yahoo! expect? A $75 billion buyout package? Rumor has it that current CEO and co-founder Jerry Yang loathed the idea of being part of Microsoft. Personal distaste, though, should never get in the way of what's best for Yahoo!'s shareholders, right?<br /><br />Yahoo! has looked a some partnerships in February that would keep it from Microsoft's clutches, but is now stating that the software maker's attempt to buy it is <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9881216-7.html">distracting its own workforce</a>. Bull. Yahoo!'s workforce apparently is already highly distracted if it can't seem to find a business model that would sustain innovation and profitable growth. Yahoo! says the bid is making it harder to hire and retain "key employees and hire new talent." <br /><br />Are you serious, Yahoo!? The company may be thinking too highly of itself, and if so, it needs to put its ego on the shelf and find a way to partner with somebody -- anybody -- to help it compete against Google. There is no way it can do this itself, as it's been shown for years now. Until then, distractions from the Microsoft bid are the order of the day. Get used to it, Yahoo! -- and don't give a lame excuse of "distracting the company" while it happens. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/microsoft-gaining-support-from-yahoo-shareholders/">Shareholders know better</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/yahoo-to-microsoft-your-bid-is-distracting-our-workforce/">Yahoo! to Microsoft: your bid is distracting our workforce</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9881216-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/yahoo-to-microsoft-your-bid-is-distracting-our-workforce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1127680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/yahoo-to-microsoft-your-bid-is-distracting-our-workforce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Microhoo</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Internal Microsoft memo may calm Yahoo!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/23/internal-microsoft-memo-may-calm-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/23/internal-microsoft-memo-may-calm-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/23/internal-microsoft-memo-may-calm-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>A memo by a senior <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) executive sets out some of the reasons for the company's bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120372329007786967.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required), "Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft's Platforms and Services Division, reiterated the Redmond, Wash., software maker's reasons behind its unsolicited offer, writing that a combination would provide a compelling alternative in search and online advertising." The note goes further to indicate that Microsoft values both the Yahoo! brands and the technical skills of its engineers.</p>
<p>Yahoo! should not take the memo seriously. It would be hard to name a company that Microsoft has purchased that still maintains its own brands and independent operations. Bill Gates has said that the software company will put its full engineering skill behind an effort to build better search technology than <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has. It may be an audacious and arrogant approach to catching the industry leader, but Microsoft has never looked for outside help to solve its most urgent problems.</p>
<p>All Yahoo! shareholders can look for in the generous Microsoft buy-out offer is a good payday. The world's largest software company looks at Yahoo! as a step in advancing its own agenda and nothing more.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/23/internal-microsoft-memo-may-calm-yahoo/">Internal Microsoft memo may calm Yahoo!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/23/internal-microsoft-memo-may-calm-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1122750/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/23/internal-microsoft-memo-may-calm-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kevin Johnson</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alibaba worries Microsoft might take its independence]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/16/alibaba-worries-microsoft-might-take-its-independence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/16/alibaba-worries-microsoft-might-take-its-independence/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/16/alibaba-worries-microsoft-might-take-its-independence/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p>Alibaba, the big Chinese e-commerce company is 39% owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). That has been OK for Alibaba; Yahoo! has not taken any role in running the company. But, the firm and the Chinese government are a little worried that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) will not see it that way if it buys Yahoo!</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120312422017973141.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required), "Alibaba has already been contacted by Chinese regulators seeking information on how it could be affected by a Microsoft purchase." The concern is perverse for two reasons.</p>
<p>China thinks nothing of allowing its sovereign funds to put capital into U.S. financial companies. Congress has already begun to worry in public that the Chinese might exert unwanted pressure on the managements of some of Wall Street's biggest companies. The Chinese cannot have it both ways, buying into American businesses while setting limitations on investments in its country.</p>
<p>What is even more obvious is that one solution is to have Microsoft simply enter into a legal agreement that makes its shares in Alibaba non-voting. This allows the big software company the advantage of an investment that will probably grow in value, and one that it will probably eventually sell back to Alibaba or even to the Chinese government.</p>
<p>Why make the issue more complicated than it really is?</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/16/alibaba-worries-microsoft-might-take-its-independence/">Alibaba worries Microsoft might take its independence</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/16/alibaba-worries-microsoft-might-take-its-independence/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1116775/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/16/alibaba-worries-microsoft-might-take-its-independence/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alibaba</category><category>China</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>sovereign funds</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades: GWW, AXP and MSFT]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/analyst-downgrades-gww-axp-and-msft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/analyst-downgrades-gww-axp-and-msft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/analyst-downgrades-gww-axp-and-msft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>W.W. Grainger, American Express and Microsoft were today's noteworthy downgrades: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Baird downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/grainger-w-w-inc/gww/nys">W.W. Grainger Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/grainger-w-w-inc/gww/nys">GWW</a>) to Neutral from Outperform, citing concerns regarding the the federal lawsuit accusing the company of overcharging the U.S. Government. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) was lowered to Market Perform from Outperform to reflect their assumption for a weaker economy. </li>
    <li>RBC Capital downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to Sector Perform from Outperform citing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) rejection of its $31/share bid and a counteroffer of $40/share. The firm expects a deal to get done between $35.00-$40.00 per share, resulting in increased dilution.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Citigroup downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/telecom-italia-s-p-a-new/ti/nys">Telecom Italia SpA </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/telecom-italia-s-p-a-new/ti/nys">TI</a>) to Hold from Buy. </li>
    <li>Thomas Weisel downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/zumiez-inc/zumz/nas">Zumiez Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/zumiez-inc/zumz/nas">ZUMZ</a>) to Market Weight from Overweight. </li>
    <li>Oppenheimer downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/independent-bank-corporation/ibcp/nas">Independent Bank Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/independent-bank-corporation/ibcp/nas">IBCP</a>) to Underperform from Perform.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/analyst-downgrades-gww-axp-and-msft/">Analyst downgrades: GWW, AXP and MSFT</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/analyst-downgrades-gww-axp-and-msft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1111794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/analyst-downgrades-gww-axp-and-msft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Express</category><category>AmericanExpress</category><category>AXP</category><category>downgrades</category><category>GWW</category><category>IBCP</category><category>Independent Bank</category><category>IndependentBank</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Telecom Italia</category><category>TelecomItalia</category><category>TI</category><category>W.W. Grainger</category><category>W.w.Grainger</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><category>Zumiez</category><category>ZUMZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Microsoft go DEFCON 1 on Yahoo?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/10/will-microsoft-go-defcon-1-on-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/10/will-microsoft-go-defcon-1-on-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/10/will-microsoft-go-defcon-1-on-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/yhoo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />According to the <a href="http://www.wsj.com"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> [a paid publication], it looks like the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) board will reject Microsoft's $31 buyout offer. Basically, the company wants at least $40 (hey, why not?).</p>
<p>So, now the ball's in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) court. What to do? There are several options.</p>
<p>Of course, Microsoft can up its bid. But why? After all, who can really compete against Microsoft? In other words, why should Microsoft bid against itself?</p>
<p>The #2 option: go hostile. This means filing a tender offer and waging proxy fight. In other words, shareholders will be able to make up their own minds. And, given that the Yahoo! shareholder base has changed significantly (that is, with lots of money-grubbing hedge funds), I think there will be lots of pressure to get a deal done.</p>
<p>True, the hostile approach may be scary to Yahoo! employees. But, I have to assume they also realize that Microsoft is going to gut headcount anyway.</p>
<p>In fact, I think a hostile approach can actually get to a negotiation -- and perhaps a small boost in the offer.</p>
<p>Something else: speed is important. With the election year, it's not easy to predict who will be in the White House -- and how a new regulatory regime may impact the antitrust implications of a Microsoft-Yahoo! combo.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><em><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" width="1" border="0" /> and</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><em><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" width="1" border="0" />. He also operates </em><a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com"><em>DealProfiles.com</em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/10/will-microsoft-go-defcon-1-on-yahoo/">Will Microsoft go DEFCON 1 on Yahoo?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/10/will-microsoft-go-defcon-1-on-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1111037/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/10/will-microsoft-go-defcon-1-on-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Takeovers</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo to Microsoft: Drop Dead]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-to-microsoft-drop-dead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-to-microsoft-drop-dead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-to-microsoft-drop-dead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/technology/09cnd-yahoo.html?hp">New York Times</a></em> reports that the board of <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) has rejected <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"><strong>Microsoft Corp.</strong></a>'s<strong> </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) $44.6 billion takeover bid. Does Yahoo have a bigger bid in the wings? No, of course not. It's trying to use a shaky legal argument -- that the deal -- which was nearly double Yahoo!'s pre-deal value -- severely undervalues Yahoo!</p>
<p>If Yahoo! has so many wonderful ways to increase its shareholder value, why are they not reflected in its stock price? Meanwhile, the best short-term money making idea would be to boost Yahoo!'s revenue and profit by outsourcing its search-related ad business to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"><strong>Google Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>), because Google's advertising technology generates far more cash for every search query, on average.</p>
<p>But Yahoo! has resisted this move because it invested in Panama, which was intended to compete with Google. For Yahoo! executives, replacing Panama, or other parts of its search system, with Google's technology would be an admission of defeat.</p>
<p>If this is the best that Yahoo! can do to respond to Microsoft's bid, I think shareholders better hope that Microsoft doesn't decide to just walk away. If it thinks that this head fake will get Microsoft to raise its bid, then maybe it makes sense.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#888888">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#888888">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-to-microsoft-drop-dead/">Yahoo to Microsoft: Drop Dead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-to-microsoft-drop-dead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1110906/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-to-microsoft-drop-dead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Panama</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! tries to get a higher bid]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-tries-to-get-a-higher-bid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-tries-to-get-a-higher-bid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-tries-to-get-a-higher-bid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) board met Friday to discuss a buy-out bid from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). No news was issued by the company, but several media outlets reported that the group discussed licensing its search rights to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) for a high sum or trying to get a better bid from Microsoft</p>
<p>Yahoo!'s board can grow old waiting for a bump up in that offer. <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>wrote, referring to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120251420230755097.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">the Google option</a> (subscription required), that "such a deal could increase Yahoo's cash flow and give it more latitude to try to thwart the Microsoft approach." While the deal might bring in more money and allow Yahoo! to fire much of its R&amp;D staff, there is no guarantee that it will keep the firm's stock north of $30. Except for periods when there were rumors of a buy-out, shares have traded in the $20s and were below $20 slightly before the bid from Redmond.</p>
<p>Steve Ballmer knows all of this.</p>
<p>It's time for Yahoo! to admit that its business has faltered badly and probably cannot recover. It could always out-sourced its search business to Google. It clearly never thought the idea was good enough.</p>
<p>And, regulators are not going to like the idea of the No.1 and No. 2 search companies teaming up.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-tries-to-get-a-higher-bid/">Yahoo! tries to get a higher bid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-tries-to-get-a-higher-bid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1110780/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/yahoo-tries-to-get-a-higher-bid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deals</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Liking the price action in Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/liking-the-price-action-in-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/liking-the-price-action-in-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/liking-the-price-action-in-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>I don't like the idea of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/02/microsoft-yahoo-what-happens-now/">bidding </a>for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Hey, everything may turn out rosy in the end, it may turn out to be just what the Seattle software juggernaut needs in its effort to keep the competitive threat of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) at bay, but I still shudder at the amount of cash being offered for the internet portal.</p>
<p>I do, however, like Microsoft, and have been waiting for a price drop in its shares so that I may get in on it for either a short-term or long-term timeframe (well, I suppose those are the only timeframes available, come to think of it). I'm liking Microsoft's fundamentals more and more, especially now that its Xbox franchise has been doing well. And I'm particularly keen on its cash-flow prospects and its ability to raise its quarterly dividend in the future (yes, even with the Yahoo! purchase). </p>
<p>That being said, you've got to like the interesting set-up here for a trade. If the stock gets close to the 52-week low, I'm going to have to strongly consider it for my portfolio. At $37, I was reluctant to chase it; at $26, it's suddenly become attractive to me again. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: Steven Mallas may buy Microsoft shares after this post. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/liking-the-price-action-in-microsoft/">Liking the price action in Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/liking-the-price-action-in-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1108423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/liking-the-price-action-in-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Yahoo!</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Yahoo! bid has a lot to do with mobile]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/microsofts-yahoo-bid-has-a-lot-to-do-with-mobile/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/microsofts-yahoo-bid-has-a-lot-to-do-with-mobile/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/microsofts-yahoo-bid-has-a-lot-to-do-with-mobile/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/yahoogo_search.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) continues to dominate the news nearly a week after announcing its $44 billion bid for internet rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Analysts are still deciphering the reasons why the world's largest software company wants to pay such a premium for an ailing -- but still powerful -- internet brand. The prevailing wisdom is that the growing power of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has finally forced Microsoft's hand here. To a point, that's very much true.<br /><br />But the future of the web may not be fought on the laptop screen nearest you, but instead on the mobile screen that goes everywhere in your pocket. With that "internet everywhere" mentality that's still not a huge reality for millions of consumers, mobile advertising beckons as a huge revenue stream. <br /><br />Tapping into that may be a large reason why Microsoft wants to merge with Yahoo!, according to Gartner analyst Philip Redman. "Leadership in mobile advertising is still unclaimed, while Google is threatening to do there what it did on the internet, so Microsoft is being preemptive."<br /><br />Is mobile advertising the next coming of the internet? Many industry watchers and analysts believe so, although most phones absolutely stink as portable internet access terminals. The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iPhone has been the game-changer; it was made for the internet. Well, if you can see past that poky-slow wireless cellular connection that you probably have. <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9061023&amp;intsrc=news_ts_head">Analyst Jeff Kagan</a> said that "Yahoo touches so many customers and there's so much advertising potential in this deal . . . It's the kind of world Microsoft loves."<br /><em><br />Disclosure: the author holds a long position in MSFT.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/microsofts-yahoo-bid-has-a-lot-to-do-with-mobile/">Microsoft's Yahoo! bid has a lot to do with mobile</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9061023&amp;intsrc=news_ts_head>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/microsofts-yahoo-bid-has-a-lot-to-do-with-mobile/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1108036/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/microsofts-yahoo-bid-has-a-lot-to-do-with-mobile/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Jeff Kagan</category><category>JeffKagan</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSN Mobile</category><category>MsnMobile</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>Yahoo! Mobile</category><category>Yahoo!Mobile</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
